Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Class of Quantum Error-Correcting Codes Saturating the Quantum Hamming Bound

Daniel Gottesman

TL;DR

This paper develops a stabilizer-based framework to analyze quantum error-correcting codes and constructs an infinite family of non-degenerate codes that saturate the quantum Hamming bound for single-qubit errors ($t=1$). By selecting an abelian stabilizer with $a=j+2$ generators for block length $n=2^j$, it achieves $k=n-j-2$ and demonstrates an explicit $n=8$ example encoding 3 qubits, with a method to label all single-qubit Pauli errors via a homomorphism $f:{\cal G}\to({\bf Z}_2)^a$. The results show that the efficiency $k/n$ approaches 1 for large $n$, analogous to classical Hamming codes, and also establish that degenerate codes cannot beat the quantum Hamming bound for $t=1$. The work provides practical, constructive guidance for designing high-rate QECCs and highlights the stabilizer approach as a powerful tool for quantum error correction.

Abstract

I develop methods for analyzing quantum error-correcting codes, and use these methods to construct an infinite class of codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound. These codes encode $k=n-j-2$ qubits in $n=2^j$ qubits and correct $t=1$ error.

A Class of Quantum Error-Correcting Codes Saturating the Quantum Hamming Bound

TL;DR

This paper develops a stabilizer-based framework to analyze quantum error-correcting codes and constructs an infinite family of non-degenerate codes that saturate the quantum Hamming bound for single-qubit errors (). By selecting an abelian stabilizer with generators for block length , it achieves and demonstrates an explicit example encoding 3 qubits, with a method to label all single-qubit Pauli errors via a homomorphism . The results show that the efficiency approaches 1 for large , analogous to classical Hamming codes, and also establish that degenerate codes cannot beat the quantum Hamming bound for . The work provides practical, constructive guidance for designing high-rate QECCs and highlights the stabilizer approach as a powerful tool for quantum error correction.

Abstract

I develop methods for analyzing quantum error-correcting codes, and use these methods to construct an infinite class of codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound. These codes encode qubits in qubits and correct error.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 24 equations, 6 tables.