On Rationally Parametrized Modular Equations
Robert S. Maier
TL;DR
The paper presents a unified Gauss–Manin perspective for rationally parametrized modular equations tied to genus-zero $X_0(N)$, introducing canonical Hauptmoduln $t_N$ and weight-1 modular forms $rak{h}_N$ to encode modular transformations as pullbacks of Picard–Fuchs/Gauss–Manin equations. It derives explicit parametrizations and transformations for genera-zero levels, giving hypergeometric (for $N=2,3,4$) and Heun-type (for $N=5$–$9$) equations and connecting them to Ramanujan’s elliptic integrals $K_r$, including new Ramanujan-type identities and a modular interpretation of signature $2,3,4$ (and a nonclassical Gauss–Manin case for signature 6). The framework yields a rich catalog of canonical and alternative modular forms via eta-products, with detailed recurrences and eta-expansions, and provides a coherent route to modular equations for elliptic families beyond the classical $j$-invariants. The results illuminate Ramanujan’s theories as natural specializations within a modern modular-differential system, offering new transformations and a path toward a broader Gauss–Manin-based modular transformation theory.
Abstract
Many rationally parametrized elliptic modular equations are derived. Each comes from a family of elliptic curves attached to a genus-zero congruence subgroup $Γ_0(N)$, as an algebraic transformation of elliptic curve periods, parametrized by a Hauptmodul (function field generator). The periods satisfy a Picard-Fuchs equation, of hypergeometric, Heun, or more general type; so the new modular equations are algebraic transformations of special functions. When N=4,3,2 they are modular transformations of Ramanujan's elliptic integrals of signatures 2,3,4. This gives a modern interpretation to his theories of integrals to alternative bases: they are attached to certain families of elliptic curves. His anomalous theory of signature 6 turns out to fit into a general Gauss-Manin rather than a Picard-Fuchs framework.
