Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Singular elliptic problems with lack of compactness

Marius Ghergu, Vicentiu Radulescu

TL;DR

We study a nonlinear singular elliptic equation with weight in $\mathbb{R}^N$, $-\operatorname{div}(|x|^{-2a}\nabla u)=K(x)|x|^{-bp}|u|^{p-2}u+\lambda g(x)$, where $p$ is the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg critical exponent associated to $a$, $b$, and $N$, and $g$ belongs to a weighted Sobolev space $H^1_a(\mathbb{R}^N)$. Under natural assumptions on the positive potential $K$, there exists $\lambda_0>0$ such that for all $\lambda\in(0,\lambda_0)$ the problem has at least two distinct weak solutions; the proof relies on Ekeland's variational principle and the Mountain Pass theorem without the Palais-Smale condition, aided by a weighted Brezis-Lieb lemma. The analysis introduces energy functionals $J_0$ and $I$, a PS-compatibility lemma ensuring that a weak limit of a $(PS)_c$ sequence is a solution, and a weighted Brezis-Lieb lemma; it also establishes a PS-dichotomy involving the CK-N optimal constant $S(a,b)$ and shows the existence of a local minimax level $c_{0,\lambda}$ yielding a ground-state solution $u_0$, and a Mountain Pass level $c_g$ yielding a second critical point $u_1$. If $g\ge0$, a maximum principle implies both solutions can be taken positive, giving multiplicity for small $\lambda$.

Abstract

We consider the following nonlinear singular elliptic equation $$-{div} (|x|^{-2a}\nabla u)=K(x)|x|^{-bp}|u|^{p-2}u+\la g(x) \quad{in} \RR^N,$$ where $g$ belongs to an appropriate weighted Sobolev space, and $p$ denotes the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg critical exponent associated to $a$, $b$, and $N$. Under some natural assumptions on the positive potential $K(x)$ we establish the existence of some $\la\_0>0$ such that the above problem has at least two distinct solutions provided that $\la\in(0,\la\_0)$. The proof relies on Ekeland's Variational Principle and on the Mountain Pass Theorem without the Palais-Smale condition, combined with a weighted variant of the Brezis-Lieb Lemma.

Singular elliptic problems with lack of compactness

TL;DR

We study a nonlinear singular elliptic equation with weight in , , where is the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg critical exponent associated to , , and , and belongs to a weighted Sobolev space . Under natural assumptions on the positive potential , there exists such that for all the problem has at least two distinct weak solutions; the proof relies on Ekeland's variational principle and the Mountain Pass theorem without the Palais-Smale condition, aided by a weighted Brezis-Lieb lemma. The analysis introduces energy functionals and , a PS-compatibility lemma ensuring that a weak limit of a sequence is a solution, and a weighted Brezis-Lieb lemma; it also establishes a PS-dichotomy involving the CK-N optimal constant and shows the existence of a local minimax level yielding a ground-state solution , and a Mountain Pass level yielding a second critical point . If , a maximum principle implies both solutions can be taken positive, giving multiplicity for small .

Abstract

We consider the following nonlinear singular elliptic equation where belongs to an appropriate weighted Sobolev space, and denotes the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg critical exponent associated to , , and . Under some natural assumptions on the positive potential we establish the existence of some such that the above problem has at least two distinct solutions provided that . The proof relies on Ekeland's Variational Principle and on the Mountain Pass Theorem without the Palais-Smale condition, combined with a weighted variant of the Brezis-Lieb Lemma.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 3 sections, 8 theorems, 100 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Suppose that assumptions (K1), (K2), (K3) are fulfilled and fix g\in H^{-1}_a({\mathbb R} ^N)\setminus\{0\}. Then there exists \,\lambda_0>0\, such that for all \,\lambda\in(0,\lambda_0), problem (doi) has at least two solutions.

Theorems & Definitions (8)

  • Theorem 1
  • Lemma 1
  • Lemma 2
  • Lemma 3
  • Lemma 4
  • Proposition 1
  • Proposition 2
  • Proposition 3