Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On deconvolution methods

Alexander G. Ramm, A. Galstian

TL;DR

The paper addresses stable deconvolution for Volterra-type integral equations with noisy data, introducing a Laplace-domain regularization that uses a transform filter $f_N(\lambda)=(1+\lambda/N)^{-m}$ and a general decomposition ${\mathbf k}=A(I+S)$. It proves convergence and rate results under spectral-growth assumptions on $K(\lambda)$, and presents a causality-preserving recursive estimator for discrete measurements with provable convergence and rates under Hölder smoothness. Additional contributions include a structured proof framework for the proposed regularizers and a generalization to operator-valued kernels, including matrix-valued kernels and multi-dimensional systems. Overall, the methods provide practical, theoretically grounded tools for stable deconvolution in both continuous and discrete-data settings, with broad applicability to ill-posed Volterra-type problems.

Abstract

Several methods for solving efficiently the one-dimensional deconvolution problem are proposed. The problem is to solve the Volterra equation ${\mathbf k} u:=\int_0^t k(t-s)u(s)ds=g(t),\quad 0\leq t\leq T$. The data, $g(t)$, are noisy. Of special practical interest is the case when the data are noisy and known at a discrete set of times. A general approach to the deconvolution problem is proposed: represent ${\mathbf k}=A(I+S)$, where a method for a stable inversion of $A$ is known, $S$ is a compact operator, and $I+S$ is injective. This method is illustrated by examples: smooth kernels $k(t)$, and weakly singular kernels, corresponding to Abel-type of integral equations, are considered. A recursive estimation scheme for solving deconvolution problem with noisy discrete data is justified mathematically, its convergence is proved, and error estimates are obtained for the proposed deconvolution method.

On deconvolution methods

TL;DR

The paper addresses stable deconvolution for Volterra-type integral equations with noisy data, introducing a Laplace-domain regularization that uses a transform filter and a general decomposition . It proves convergence and rate results under spectral-growth assumptions on , and presents a causality-preserving recursive estimator for discrete measurements with provable convergence and rates under Hölder smoothness. Additional contributions include a structured proof framework for the proposed regularizers and a generalization to operator-valued kernels, including matrix-valued kernels and multi-dimensional systems. Overall, the methods provide practical, theoretically grounded tools for stable deconvolution in both continuous and discrete-data settings, with broad applicability to ill-posed Volterra-type problems.

Abstract

Several methods for solving efficiently the one-dimensional deconvolution problem are proposed. The problem is to solve the Volterra equation . The data, , are noisy. Of special practical interest is the case when the data are noisy and known at a discrete set of times. A general approach to the deconvolution problem is proposed: represent , where a method for a stable inversion of is known, is a compact operator, and is injective. This method is illustrated by examples: smooth kernels , and weakly singular kernels, corresponding to Abel-type of integral equations, are considered. A recursive estimation scheme for solving deconvolution problem with noisy discrete data is justified mathematically, its convergence is proved, and error estimates are obtained for the proposed deconvolution method.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 7 theorems, 58 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

If $m>a+0.5$ and $(2.3)$ holds, then there exists $N(\delta)\to \infty$ as $\delta \to 0$, such that $(1.2)$ holds with $L^2(0,\infty; e^{-2\sigma t})$ norm. If (2.2) and (2.3) hold, and $m>a+1$, then (1.2) holds with $L^\infty (0,T)$ norm. If $m>a+1$, (2.3) holds, and then $N(\delta)=O \left(\delta^{-\frac{1}{q}}\right)$, $q=a+d+1$, $\eta(\delta) = O(\delta^{\frac{d}{q}})$ if $0<d<1$, and the

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Theorem 3.2
  • Theorem 4.1
  • Theorem 4.2
  • Lemma 5.1
  • Lemma 5.2