Classical 6j-symbols and the tetrahedron
Justin Roberts
TL;DR
The paper proves that the classical SU(2) $6j$-symbol associated with a labelled tetrahedron has a precise geometric asymptotic when the labels scale by $k$. It achieves this by realizing SU(2) irreps through geometric quantization (Borel–Weil–Bott) on spheres, assembling a 24-dimensional phase space, and applying stationary-phase methods on a reduced Kähler quotient to reduce the problem to two Euclidean tetrahedra related by Regge symmetry. The main result is the asymptotic formula $\\{ kakbkckdkekf \} \\sim \\sqrt{\\frac{2}{3\\pi k^3 V}} \, \\\cos\{ \\sum (ka+1) \\frac{\\theta_a}{2} + \\frac{\\pi}{4} \\}$ for Euclidean tetrahedra with volume $V$ and dihedral angles $\\theta_a$, while exponential decay occurs in the Minkowskian case. The work also reveals a geometric spin-off: from a generic Euclidean tetrahedron one obtains twelve scissors-congruent but non-congruent tetrahedra, connected to Regge symmetry and Dehn-Hadwiger-type invariants, enriching the interplay between representation theory and 3D geometry.
Abstract
A classical 6j-symbol is a real number which can be associated to a labelling of the six edges of a tetrahedron by irreducible representations of SU(2). This abstract association is traditionally used simply to express the symmetry of the 6j-symbol, which is a purely algebraic object; however, it has a deeper geometric significance. Ponzano and Regge, expanding on work of Wigner, gave a striking (but unproved) asymptotic formula relating the value of the 6j-symbol, when the dimensions of the representations are large, to the volume of an honest Euclidean tetrahedron whose edge lengths are these dimensions. The goal of this paper is to prove and explain this formula by using geometric quantization. A surprising spin-off is that a generic Euclidean tetrahedron gives rise to a family of twelve scissors-congruent but non-congruent tetrahedra.
