Table of Contents
Fetching ...

T-Duality Can Fail

Paul S. Aspinwall, M. Ronen Plesser

TL;DR

This paper questions the exactness of T-duality in string theory once nonperturbative effects are included, focusing on the heterotic string on K3$\times T^2$ with $N=2$ in four dimensions. By exploiting a dual Type IIA description and a holonomy-based perspective, it shows that nonperturbative corrections modify the torus moduli space, breaking the expected $R\leftrightarrow 1/R$ symmetry and suggesting that dualities require large amounts of supersymmetry to be meaningful. The analysis contrasts unbroken fibre-wise duality in a two-parameter K3 model with broken T-duality when a CY threefold replaces K3, highlighting that monodromy and discriminant structures prevent a global duality group from existing at finite coupling. A holonomy-based argument further indicates dualities arise only in rigid (highly symmetric) moduli spaces, implying that the classical modular invariance of the torus can be quantum-mechanically broken in less supersymmetric compactifications. Overall, the work emphasizes that dualities are contextual, tied to SUSY and holonomy, and that string theory may invalidate naïve, geometry-based notions of size and modular symmetry in realistic, nonperturbative settings.

Abstract

We show that T-duality can be broken by nonperturbative effects in string coupling. The T-duality in question is that of the 2-torus when the heterotic string is compactified on K3 x T2. This case is compared carefully to a situation where T-duality appears to work. A holonomy argument is presented to show that T-dualities (and general U-dualities) should only be expected for large amounts of supersymmetry. This breaking of R <-> 1/R symmetry raises some interesting questions in string theory which we discuss. Finally we discuss how the classical modular group of a 2-torus appears to be broken too.

T-Duality Can Fail

TL;DR

This paper questions the exactness of T-duality in string theory once nonperturbative effects are included, focusing on the heterotic string on K3 with in four dimensions. By exploiting a dual Type IIA description and a holonomy-based perspective, it shows that nonperturbative corrections modify the torus moduli space, breaking the expected symmetry and suggesting that dualities require large amounts of supersymmetry to be meaningful. The analysis contrasts unbroken fibre-wise duality in a two-parameter K3 model with broken T-duality when a CY threefold replaces K3, highlighting that monodromy and discriminant structures prevent a global duality group from existing at finite coupling. A holonomy-based argument further indicates dualities arise only in rigid (highly symmetric) moduli spaces, implying that the classical modular invariance of the torus can be quantum-mechanically broken in less supersymmetric compactifications. Overall, the work emphasizes that dualities are contextual, tied to SUSY and holonomy, and that string theory may invalidate naïve, geometry-based notions of size and modular symmetry in realistic, nonperturbative settings.

Abstract

We show that T-duality can be broken by nonperturbative effects in string coupling. The T-duality in question is that of the 2-torus when the heterotic string is compactified on K3 x T2. This case is compared carefully to a situation where T-duality appears to work. A holonomy argument is presented to show that T-dualities (and general U-dualities) should only be expected for large amounts of supersymmetry. This breaking of R <-> 1/R symmetry raises some interesting questions in string theory which we discuss. Finally we discuss how the classical modular group of a 2-torus appears to be broken too.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 1 theorem, 23 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 1

If a geodesically complete orbifold has a rigid holonomy then it is globally a quotient of a symmetric space.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: The domain of mapping into flat coordinates when $y=0$.
  • Figure 2: The domain when $\sigma=iC$.
  • Figure 3: The moduli space for constant $y$ for $X$.

Theorems & Definitions (1)

  • Proposition 1