Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On Lorentz Invariant Actions for Chiral P-Forms

Paolo Pasti, Dmitri Sorokin, Mario Tonin

TL;DR

The paper addresses the long-standing problem of constructing manifest Lorentz-invariant actions for chiral p-forms in $D=2(p+1)$ and clarifies the relationship between an infinite-tail auxiliary-field formulation and a minimal nonpolynomial formulation with a single auxiliary scalar $a$. Through a detailed Hamiltonian analysis, it shows that the nonpolynomial action has a simple, quadratic canonical Hamiltonian and Dirac constraints that are all first class, describing a single chiral p-form, unlike the Siegel model. For the $d=2$ chiral scalar case, the authors demonstrate a twisting of the first-class constraint that can cancel the quantum central charge, suggesting a possible absence of anomaly in an appropriate quantum version; for $D=6$ chiral 2-forms the framework yields a covariant Hamiltonian structure with only first-class constraints. The work further suggests that the framework can couple to gravity covariantly, may accommodate supersymmetric extensions, and provides a controlled path toward consistent truncations and anomaly-free quantization of chiral p-forms.

Abstract

We demonstrate how a Lorentz covariant formulation of the chiral p-form model in D=2(p+1) containing infinitely many auxiliary fields is related to a Lorentz covariant formulation with only one auxiliary scalar field entering a chiral p-form action in a nonpolynomial way. The latter can be regarded as a consistent Lorentz-covariant truncation of the former. We make the Hamiltonian analysis of the model based on the nonpolynomial action and show that the Dirac constraints have a simple form and are all of the first class. In contrast to the Siegel model the constraints are not the square of second-class constraints. The canonical Hamiltonian is quadratic and determines energy of a single chiral p-form. In the case of d=2 chiral scalars the constraint can be improved by use of `twisting' procedure (without the loss of the property to be of the first class) in such a way that the central charge of the quantum constraint algebra is zero. This points to possible absence of anomaly in an appropriate quantum version of the model.

On Lorentz Invariant Actions for Chiral P-Forms

TL;DR

The paper addresses the long-standing problem of constructing manifest Lorentz-invariant actions for chiral p-forms in and clarifies the relationship between an infinite-tail auxiliary-field formulation and a minimal nonpolynomial formulation with a single auxiliary scalar . Through a detailed Hamiltonian analysis, it shows that the nonpolynomial action has a simple, quadratic canonical Hamiltonian and Dirac constraints that are all first class, describing a single chiral p-form, unlike the Siegel model. For the chiral scalar case, the authors demonstrate a twisting of the first-class constraint that can cancel the quantum central charge, suggesting a possible absence of anomaly in an appropriate quantum version; for chiral 2-forms the framework yields a covariant Hamiltonian structure with only first-class constraints. The work further suggests that the framework can couple to gravity covariantly, may accommodate supersymmetric extensions, and provides a controlled path toward consistent truncations and anomaly-free quantization of chiral p-forms.

Abstract

We demonstrate how a Lorentz covariant formulation of the chiral p-form model in D=2(p+1) containing infinitely many auxiliary fields is related to a Lorentz covariant formulation with only one auxiliary scalar field entering a chiral p-form action in a nonpolynomial way. The latter can be regarded as a consistent Lorentz-covariant truncation of the former. We make the Hamiltonian analysis of the model based on the nonpolynomial action and show that the Dirac constraints have a simple form and are all of the first class. In contrast to the Siegel model the constraints are not the square of second-class constraints. The canonical Hamiltonian is quadratic and determines energy of a single chiral p-form. In the case of d=2 chiral scalars the constraint can be improved by use of `twisting' procedure (without the loss of the property to be of the first class) in such a way that the central charge of the quantum constraint algebra is zero. This points to possible absence of anomaly in an appropriate quantum version of the model.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 55 equations.