Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the classification of quantum W-algebras

P. Bowcock, G Watts

TL;DR

The paper develops a general framework for classifying and understanding quantum W-algebras by introducing deformability, positive-definiteness, and reductivity. It proves that reductive W-algebras associate to a reductive finite Lie algebra $g$ endowed with an $sl(2)$ embedding, which fixes conformal weights and extends to bosonic/fermionic content via generalized Drinfeld–Sokolov reductions. A central construction is the vacuum-preserving algebra (vpa); its linearised version yields a finite Lie algebra that, for positive-definite classical limits, decomposes as a semisimple plus abelian algebra, i.e., a reductive structure. The work connects W-algebras to finite Lie algebras through Drinfeld–Sokolov data, provides a concrete method to obtain classical W-algebras for given $(g,sl(2))$, and offers a program to classify deformable W-algebras, including automorphism-induced families and those without Kac–Moody components. This framework clarifies how the field content and spins arise from $sl(2)$ embeddings and lays groundwork for future quantum classifications and uniqueness analyses.

Abstract

In this paper we consider the structure of general quantum W-algebras. We introduce the notions of deformability, positive-definiteness, and reductivity of a W-algebra. We show that one can associate a reductive finite Lie algebra to each reductive W-algebra. The finite Lie algebra is also endowed with a preferred $sl(2)$ subalgebra, which gives the conformal weights of the W-algebra. We extend this to cover W-algebras containing both bosonic and fermionic fields, and illustrate our ideas with the Poisson bracket algebras of generalised Drinfeld-Sokolov Hamiltonian systems. We then discuss the possibilities of classifying deformable W-algebras which fall outside this class in the context of automorphisms of Lie algebras. In conclusion we list the cases in which the W-algebra has no weight one fields, and further, those in which it has only one weight two field.

On the classification of quantum W-algebras

TL;DR

The paper develops a general framework for classifying and understanding quantum W-algebras by introducing deformability, positive-definiteness, and reductivity. It proves that reductive W-algebras associate to a reductive finite Lie algebra endowed with an embedding, which fixes conformal weights and extends to bosonic/fermionic content via generalized Drinfeld–Sokolov reductions. A central construction is the vacuum-preserving algebra (vpa); its linearised version yields a finite Lie algebra that, for positive-definite classical limits, decomposes as a semisimple plus abelian algebra, i.e., a reductive structure. The work connects W-algebras to finite Lie algebras through Drinfeld–Sokolov data, provides a concrete method to obtain classical W-algebras for given , and offers a program to classify deformable W-algebras, including automorphism-induced families and those without Kac–Moody components. This framework clarifies how the field content and spins arise from embeddings and lays groundwork for future quantum classifications and uniqueness analyses.

Abstract

In this paper we consider the structure of general quantum W-algebras. We introduce the notions of deformability, positive-definiteness, and reductivity of a W-algebra. We show that one can associate a reductive finite Lie algebra to each reductive W-algebra. The finite Lie algebra is also endowed with a preferred subalgebra, which gives the conformal weights of the W-algebra. We extend this to cover W-algebras containing both bosonic and fermionic fields, and illustrate our ideas with the Poisson bracket algebras of generalised Drinfeld-Sokolov Hamiltonian systems. We then discuss the possibilities of classifying deformable W-algebras which fall outside this class in the context of automorphisms of Lie algebras. In conclusion we list the cases in which the W-algebra has no weight one fields, and further, those in which it has only one weight two field.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 103 equations.