Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Dark Energy: the equation of state description versus scalar-tensor or modified gravity

S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov

Abstract

Dark energy dynamics of the universe can be achieved by equivalent mathematical descriptions taking into account generalized fluid equations of state in General Relativity, scalar-tensor theories or modified F(R) gravity in Einstein or Jordan frames. The corresponding technique transforming equation of state description to scalar-tensor or modified gravity is explicitly presented. We show that such equivalent pictures can be discriminated by matching solutions with data capable of selecting the true physical frame.

Dark Energy: the equation of state description versus scalar-tensor or modified gravity

Abstract

Dark energy dynamics of the universe can be achieved by equivalent mathematical descriptions taking into account generalized fluid equations of state in General Relativity, scalar-tensor theories or modified F(R) gravity in Einstein or Jordan frames. The corresponding technique transforming equation of state description to scalar-tensor or modified gravity is explicitly presented. We show that such equivalent pictures can be discriminated by matching solutions with data capable of selecting the true physical frame.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 77 equations, 3 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: The distance moduli $\mu$ for the $\Lambda$CDM and the exponential potential models, obtained from the best fit parameters of Table II, are compared with SNeIa data in Riess04. The two curves practically coincide for $z\leq 2$.
  • Figure 2: The CMBR angular power spectrum $Q \equiv l(l+1)C_l/2\pi$ for the two models, obtained with CAMB codes CAMB from the best fit parameters of Table II. The two curves do not coincide for small $l$'s, where the exponential potential gives higher values. We have to note that we are exploring a different range of $z$ with respect to that in Fig.1.
  • Figure 3: Plot of the scalar-field equation of state versus ${\log}_{10}a$ with the best fit value of $\Omega_M = 0.298$. The vertical bar marks the today value of scale factor ${\log}_{10} a_0$. Only with this choice of variables, there is evidence of a transition from $w \approx -1$ in the past to $w\approx-0.5$ in the future. This means that other constant values of $w$ can be generically recovered from scalar-tensor theory, also for exponential potentials, so that $\Lambda$CDM does not coincides with exponential models for any $w$ and any $z$.