Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Supersymmetric D-branes and calibrations on general N=1 backgrounds

Luca Martucci, Paul Smyth

TL;DR

This work develops a unified framework to analyze supersymmetric D-branes in general ${\cal N}=1$ flux backgrounds using two $O(6,6)$ pure spinors $\Psi^\pm$ that encode the internal geometry. It derives brane SUSY conditions from κ-symmetry, showing that a brane must wrap a generalised complex submanifold associated with the integrable pure spinor and must satisfy a stability condition linked to the non-integrable spinor; together these reduce to a generalised calibration expressed in terms of $\Psi^\pm$ and RR potentials. The results illuminate the geometric and stability data governing D-branes in flux backgrounds and reinforce a generalized mirror symmetry exchanging IIA and IIB data, including the corresponding calibrations. By specializing to ${\rm SU}(3)$-structure manifolds, the paper recovers familiar holomorphic and coisotropic brane cases while placing them in the broader $SU(3)\times SU(3)$ generalized geometry framework. Overall, the work provides precise, calibration-based criteria for constructing and studying SUSY D-branes in flux backgrounds with potential implications for phenomenology and holography.

Abstract

We study the conditions to have supersymmetric D-branes on general {\cal N}=1 backgrounds with Ramond-Ramond fluxes. These conditions can be written in terms of the two pure spinors associated to the SU(3)\times SU(3) structure on T_M\oplus T^\star_M, and can be split into two parts each involving a different pure spinor. The first involves the integrable pure spinor and requires the D-brane to wrap a generalised complex submanifold with respect to the generalised complex structure associated to it. The second contains the non-integrable pure spinor and is related to the stability of the brane. The two conditions can be rephrased as a generalised calibration condition for the brane. The results preserve the generalised mirror symmetry relating the type IIA and IIB backgrounds considered, giving further evidence for this duality.

Supersymmetric D-branes and calibrations on general N=1 backgrounds

TL;DR

This work develops a unified framework to analyze supersymmetric D-branes in general flux backgrounds using two pure spinors that encode the internal geometry. It derives brane SUSY conditions from κ-symmetry, showing that a brane must wrap a generalised complex submanifold associated with the integrable pure spinor and must satisfy a stability condition linked to the non-integrable spinor; together these reduce to a generalised calibration expressed in terms of and RR potentials. The results illuminate the geometric and stability data governing D-branes in flux backgrounds and reinforce a generalized mirror symmetry exchanging IIA and IIB data, including the corresponding calibrations. By specializing to -structure manifolds, the paper recovers familiar holomorphic and coisotropic brane cases while placing them in the broader generalized geometry framework. Overall, the work provides precise, calibration-based criteria for constructing and studying SUSY D-branes in flux backgrounds with potential implications for phenomenology and holography.

Abstract

We study the conditions to have supersymmetric D-branes on general {\cal N}=1 backgrounds with Ramond-Ramond fluxes. These conditions can be written in terms of the two pure spinors associated to the SU(3)\times SU(3) structure on T_M\oplus T^\star_M, and can be split into two parts each involving a different pure spinor. The first involves the integrable pure spinor and requires the D-brane to wrap a generalised complex submanifold with respect to the generalised complex structure associated to it. The second contains the non-integrable pure spinor and is related to the stability of the brane. The two conditions can be rephrased as a generalised calibration condition for the brane. The results preserve the generalised mirror symmetry relating the type IIA and IIB backgrounds considered, giving further evidence for this duality.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 91 equations.