Gravitational radiation from cosmic (super)strings: bursts, stochastic background, and observational windows
Thibault Damour, Alexander Vilenkin
TL;DR
This paper reexamines gravitational-wave signals from cosmic strings, including cosmic superstrings, by introducing two key extensions to the standard network: a reduced reconnection probability $p$ and a variable loop-size parameter $\epsilon$. It analyzes both GW bursts from cusps and the stochastic GW background, deriving how the observables depend on $p$ and $\epsilon$ and showing that previous results are largely robust except in extreme small-$\epsilon$ regimes. The study highlights that lower $p$ generally enhances detectability in both bursts and the stochastic background, while very small $\epsilon$ can suppress signals in certain frequency bands, especially for small $G\mu$. It also connects these theoretical insights to current and future pulsar timing array sensitivities, arguing for renewed pulsar data analyses and improved string-network simulations to constrain $\alpha$ and the cusp rate $c$ for precise predictions.
Abstract
The gravitational wave (GW) signals emitted by a network of cosmic strings are reexamined in view of the possible formation of a network of cosmic superstrings at the end of brane inflation. The reconnection probability $p$ of intersecting fundamental or Dirichlet strings might be much smaller than 1, and the properties of the resulting string network may differ significantly from those of ordinary strings (which have $p=1$). In addition, it has been recently suggested that the typical length of newly formed loops may differ by a factor $ε\ll 1$ from its standard estimate. Here, we analyze the effects of the two parameters $p$ and $ε$ on the GW signatures of strings. We consider both the GW bursts emitted from cusps of oscillating string loops, which have been suggested as candidate sources for the LIGO/VIRGO and LISA interferometers, and the stochastic GW background, which may be detectable by pulsar timing observations. In both cases we find that previously obtained results are \textit{quite robust}, at least when the loop sizes are not suppressed by many orders of magnitude relative to the standard scenario. We urge pulsar observers to reanalyze a recently obtained 17-year combined data set to see whether the large scatter exhibited by a fraction of the data might be due to a transient GW burst activity of some sort, e.g. to a near cusp event.
