Twisted K-Theory from Monodromies
Jarah Evslin
TL;DR
The paper analyzes how RR flux configurations may be identified by twisted K-theory despite differing in cohomology via monodromies from mortal branes and, in the presence of NS5-branes, further identifications. It demonstrates via MMS-like examples that certain fluxes, such as a Romans mass $G_0$ arising after brane decay, are not captured by twisted K-theory when $dG$ has nontrivial compactly supported cohomology, and shows monodromies shift RR potentials by integers. An $E_8$ bundle formalism ties these classifications to a unified topological framework, with the M-theory picture producing a correspondence between M2-brane charge and $\pi_3(E_8)$, and a loop-group extension $LE_8$ yielding the type II connection. The results indicate twisted K-theory is an approximate, not complete, classifier of fluxes and highlight future work on S-duality covariant AHSS and NS5-monodromies to extend the framework.
Abstract
RR fluxes representing different cohomology classes may correspond to the same twisted K-theory class. We argue that such fluxes are related by monodromies, generalizing and sometimes T-dual to the familiar monodromies of a D7-brane. A generalized theta angle is also transformed, but changes by a multiple of 2pi. As an application, NS5-brane monodromies modify the twisted K-theory classification of fluxes. Furthermore, in the noncompact case K-theory does not distinguish flux configurations in which dG is nontrivial in compactly supported cohomology. Such fluxes are realized as the decay products of unstable D-branes that wrapped nontrivial cycles. This is interpreted using the E8 bundle formalism.
