Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant
Lisa Dyson, Matthew Kleban, Leonard Susskind
TL;DR
Dyson, Kleban, and Susskind explore the implications of a cosmological constant through horizon complementarity and causal-patch holography, arguing that a finite, unitary description yields inevitable Poincaré recurrences and deep paradoxes about initial conditions and the arrow of time. Using AdS black hole analogies and an observocentric gauge, they show horizon degrees of freedom exchange with bulk energy yet recognize tensions with standard cosmology and speculative dS/CFT ideas. Their analysis suggests that, if a true cosmological constant exists, most livable histories arise from rare fluctuations rather than conventional inflation, making our universe extraordinarily atypical unless additional structure or weighting is imposed. Consequently, either the cosmological constant must be reconciled with new physics or the recurrence-dominated picture must be revised to explain our observed cosmos.
Abstract
In this paper we consider the implications of a cosmological constant for the evolution of the universe, under a set of assumptions motivated by the holographic and horizon complementarity principles. We discuss the ``causal patch" description of spacetime required by this framework, and present some simple examples of cosmologies described this way. We argue that these assumptions inevitably lead to very deep paradoxes, which seem to require major revisions of our usual assumptions.
