Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Effective Lagrangians and Universality Classes of Nonlinear Bigravity

Thibault Damour, Ian I. Kogan

TL;DR

Damour and Kogan develop a fully nonlinear bigravity framework, introducing universality classes of two-metric effective Lagrangians and emphasizing ultra-local interactions between $g_L$ and $g_R$ via a potential $V(g_L,g_R)$. They show how such theories emerge naturally from brane worlds, certain Kaluza-Klein constructions, and noncommutative geometry, deriving concrete nonlinear actions and examining their linear limits. The work analyzes the dynamical structure (via EOM and ADM) and explores phenomenological implications, including a tensor-quintessence-like mechanism that could drive cosmic acceleration while preserving local GR tests. They argue that nonlinear bigravity may sidestep some classic massive-gravity pathologies but acknowledge critical open issues (ghosts, stability, and matching to local sources) that require further study (DKP1, DKP2).

Abstract

We discuss the fully non-linear formulation of multigravity. The concept of universality classes of effective Lagrangians describing bigravity, which is the simplest form of multigravity, is introduced. We show that non-linear multigravity theories can naturally arise in several different physical contexts: brane configurations, certain Kaluza-Klein reductions and some non-commutative geometry models. The formal and phenomenological aspects of multigravity (including the problems linked to the linearized theory of massive gravitons) are briefly discussed.

Effective Lagrangians and Universality Classes of Nonlinear Bigravity

TL;DR

Damour and Kogan develop a fully nonlinear bigravity framework, introducing universality classes of two-metric effective Lagrangians and emphasizing ultra-local interactions between and via a potential . They show how such theories emerge naturally from brane worlds, certain Kaluza-Klein constructions, and noncommutative geometry, deriving concrete nonlinear actions and examining their linear limits. The work analyzes the dynamical structure (via EOM and ADM) and explores phenomenological implications, including a tensor-quintessence-like mechanism that could drive cosmic acceleration while preserving local GR tests. They argue that nonlinear bigravity may sidestep some classic massive-gravity pathologies but acknowledge critical open issues (ghosts, stability, and matching to local sources) that require further study (DKP1, DKP2).

Abstract

We discuss the fully non-linear formulation of multigravity. The concept of universality classes of effective Lagrangians describing bigravity, which is the simplest form of multigravity, is introduced. We show that non-linear multigravity theories can naturally arise in several different physical contexts: brane configurations, certain Kaluza-Klein reductions and some non-commutative geometry models. The formal and phenomenological aspects of multigravity (including the problems linked to the linearized theory of massive gravitons) are briefly discussed.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 94 equations, 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Regular spectrum on (Fig.1 a) versus bigravity (Fig.1 b) or quazi-localized gravity (Fig. 1 c). The last spectrum is continuous but the first band is very narrow in comparison with the gap between bands.
  • Figure 2: Warped metric for single flat brane (Fig. 2a) and bounce for a two-brane configuration (Fig. 2b). $L_2$ is the separation between branes and $L_1$ is the position of the bounce. If $L_1 \ll L_2$ the metric is mostly concentrated on a right brane and if $L_2-L_1 \ll L_1$ then it is concentrated on the left brane.
  • Figure 3: Manifold $\Gamma$ (Fig. 3a) is on the verge of splitting into two classically disconnected manifolds $\Gamma_1$ and $\Gamma_2$ (Fig. 3b). These two manifolds may be connected at the quantum level.
  • Figure 4: Here $L_1$ is the position of the bounce. The left configuration is just the mirror image of the right one and the positions of the bounces are related by $\bar{L}_1 = L_2 -L_1$. Under this transformation left and right branes are exchange their roles and, at the same time, $\alpha_R =\exp(2L_1-L_2) \rightarrow \bar{\alpha}_R = \exp(2L_2 - L_1) = \alpha^{-1}_R$.