Table of Contents
Fetching ...

String Theory and Quintessence

Simeon Hellerman, Nemanja Kaloper, Leonard Susskind

TL;DR

The paper argues that string theory, as traditionally formulated with S-matrix-like observables, struggles to describe accelerating universes. It analyzes observables across flat, AdS, and cosmological backgrounds, concluding that future horizons in quintessence-like scenarios obstruct a standard S-matrix description. By examining Q-space with -1<w<-1/3, it shows the resulting causal diamonds and horizons undermining observable, global data, and it derives a no-go result: single-field potentials leading to eternal quintessence cannot asymptotically approach a supersymmetric vacuum with ∂φW=0. The work suggests that preserving a consistent string-theoretic description of our accelerating universe may require novel observables or a revised framework beyond the current S-matrix paradigm.

Abstract

We discuss the obstacles for defining a set of observable quantities analogous to an S-matrix which are needed to formulate string theory in an accelerating universe. We show that the quintessence models with the equations of state $-1 < w <-1/3$ have future horizons and may be no better suited to an S-matrix or S-vector description. We also show that in a class of theories with a stable supersymmetric vacuum, a system cannot relax into a zero-energy supersymmetric vacuum while accelerating if the evolution is dominated by a single scalar field with a stable potential. Thus describing an eternally accelerating universe may be a challenge for string theory as presently defined.

String Theory and Quintessence

TL;DR

The paper argues that string theory, as traditionally formulated with S-matrix-like observables, struggles to describe accelerating universes. It analyzes observables across flat, AdS, and cosmological backgrounds, concluding that future horizons in quintessence-like scenarios obstruct a standard S-matrix description. By examining Q-space with -1<w<-1/3, it shows the resulting causal diamonds and horizons undermining observable, global data, and it derives a no-go result: single-field potentials leading to eternal quintessence cannot asymptotically approach a supersymmetric vacuum with ∂φW=0. The work suggests that preserving a consistent string-theoretic description of our accelerating universe may require novel observables or a revised framework beyond the current S-matrix paradigm.

Abstract

We discuss the obstacles for defining a set of observable quantities analogous to an S-matrix which are needed to formulate string theory in an accelerating universe. We show that the quintessence models with the equations of state have future horizons and may be no better suited to an S-matrix or S-vector description. We also show that in a class of theories with a stable supersymmetric vacuum, a system cannot relax into a zero-energy supersymmetric vacuum while accelerating if the evolution is dominated by a single scalar field with a stable potential. Thus describing an eternally accelerating universe may be a challenge for string theory as presently defined.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 33 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Causal structure of FRW spacetime.
  • Figure 2: Causal structure of deSitter spacetime.
  • Figure 3: Causal structure of Schwarzschild spacetime.
  • Figure 4: Causal structure of a spatially flat Universe dominated by $-1<w<-1/3$ matter.
  • Figure 5: Causal structure of a spatially flat Universe dominated by $w=-1/3$ matter.