Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Probing NMSSM Scenarios with Minimal Fine-Tuning by Searching for Decays of the Upsilon to a Light CP-Odd Higgs Boson

Radovan Dermisek, John F. Gunion, Bob McElrath

Abstract

Completely natural electroweak symmetry breaking is easily achieved in supersymmetric models if there is a SM-like Higgs boson, $h$, with $m_h\lsim 100\gev$. In the minimal supersymmetric model, such an $h$ decays mainly to $b\anti b$ and is ruled out by LEP constraints. However, if the MSSM Higgs sector is expanded so that $h$ decays mainly to still lighter Higgs bosons, e.g. $h\to aa$, with $BR(h\to aa)>0.7$, and if $m_a<2m_b$, then the LEP constraints are satisfied. In this letter, we show that in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric model the above $h$ and $a$ properties (for the lightest CP-even and CP-odd Higgs bosons, respectively) imply a lower bound on $BR(Υ\to \gam a)$ that dedicated runs at present (and future) $B$ factories can explore.

Probing NMSSM Scenarios with Minimal Fine-Tuning by Searching for Decays of the Upsilon to a Light CP-Odd Higgs Boson

Abstract

Completely natural electroweak symmetry breaking is easily achieved in supersymmetric models if there is a SM-like Higgs boson, , with . In the minimal supersymmetric model, such an decays mainly to and is ruled out by LEP constraints. However, if the MSSM Higgs sector is expanded so that decays mainly to still lighter Higgs bosons, e.g. , with , and if , then the LEP constraints are satisfied. In this letter, we show that in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric model the above and properties (for the lightest CP-even and CP-odd Higgs bosons, respectively) imply a lower bound on that dedicated runs at present (and future) factories can explore.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 equations, 2 figures.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: ${\rm Br}(\Upsilon\to\gamma a_1)$ for NMSSM scenarios with various ranges for $m_{a_1}$: dark grey (blue) = $m_{a_1}<2m_\tau$; medium grey (red) = $2m_\tau<m_{a_1}<7.5~{\rm GeV}$; light grey (green) = $7.5~{\rm GeV}<m_{a_1}<8.8~{\rm GeV}$; and black = $8.8~{\rm GeV}<m_{a_1}<9.2~{\rm GeV}$. The plots are for $\tan\beta=10$ and $M_{1,2,3}(m_Z)=100,200,300~{\rm GeV}$. The left plot comes from the $A_\lambda,A_\kappa$ scan described in the text, holding $\mu_{\rm eff}(m_Z)=150~{\rm GeV}$ fixed. The right plot shows results for $F<15$ scenarios with $m_{a_1}<9.2~{\rm GeV}$ found in a general scan over all NMSSM parameters holding $\tan\beta$ and $M_{1,2,3}$ fixed as stated.
  • Figure 2: We plot ${\rm Br}(\Upsilon\to \gamma a_1)$ as a function of $\cos\theta_A$ for the $A_\lambda,A_\kappa$ scan, taking $M_{1,2,3}(m_Z)=100,200,300~{\rm GeV}$, $\mu_{\rm eff}(m_Z)=150~{\rm GeV}$ with $\tan\beta=3$ (left) and $\tan\beta=50$ (right). The point notation is as in Fig. \ref{['upsilon']}.