Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The hadronic contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon

J. F. de Troconiz, F. J. Yndurain

Abstract

We present a new, completely revised calculation of the muon anomalous magnetic moment, $a_μ=(g_μ-2)/2$, comparing it with the more recent experimental determination of this quantity; this furnishes an important test of theories of strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions. These theoretical and experimental determinations give the very precise numbers, $$10^{11}\times a_μ=\cases{116 591 806\pm50\pm10 ({\rm rad.})\pm30 (\ell\times\ell)\quad\hbox{[Th., no $τ$]}\cr 116 591 889\pm49\pm10 ({\rm rad.})\pm30 (\ell\times\ell)\quad\hbox{[Theory, $τ$]}\cr 116 592 080\pm60\quad\hbox{[Experiment]}.\cr}$$ In the theoretical evaluations, the first quantity does not, and the second one does, use information from $τ$ decay. The first errors for the theoretical evaluations include statistical plus systematic errors; the other ones are the estimated errors due to incomplete treatment of radiative corrections and the estimated error in the light-by-light scattering contribution. We thus have a significant mismatch between theory and experiment. We also use part of the theoretical calculations to give a precise evaluation of the electromagnetic coupling on the $Z$, $\barα_{\rm Q.E.D.}(M^2_{Z})$, of the masses and widths of the (charged and neutral) rho resonances, of the scattering length and effective range for the P wave in $ππ$ scattering, and of the quadratic radius and second coefficient of the pion form factor.

The hadronic contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon

Abstract

We present a new, completely revised calculation of the muon anomalous magnetic moment, , comparing it with the more recent experimental determination of this quantity; this furnishes an important test of theories of strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions. These theoretical and experimental determinations give the very precise numbers, In the theoretical evaluations, the first quantity does not, and the second one does, use information from decay. The first errors for the theoretical evaluations include statistical plus systematic errors; the other ones are the estimated errors due to incomplete treatment of radiative corrections and the estimated error in the light-by-light scattering contribution. We thus have a significant mismatch between theory and experiment. We also use part of the theoretical calculations to give a precise evaluation of the electromagnetic coupling on the , , of the masses and widths of the (charged and neutral) rho resonances, of the scattering length and effective range for the P wave in scattering, and of the quadratic radius and second coefficient of the pion form factor.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 68 equations, 7 figures.

Figures (7)

  • Figure :
  • Figure :
  • Figure :
  • Figure :
  • Figure :
  • ...and 2 more figures