Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Higgsless Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from Theory Space

Roshan Foadi, Shrihari Gopalakrishna, Carl Schmidt

TL;DR

Problem: achieve electroweak symmetry breaking without a Higgs while preserving unitarity in $W_LW_L$ scattering. Approach: a deconstructed theory-space chain $U(1)\times [SU(2)]^N\times SU(2)_{N+1}$ with nonlinear Sigma fields and tunable end couplings, whose heavy vector tower restores (delays) unitarity. Key findings: the leading energy-growing term scales as $R \sim {g^2\over (N+1)^2}$, so unitarity violation is postponed; in the $N+1\to\infty$ limit the model becomes a 5D $SU(2)$ gauge theory on an interval with boundary terms, yielding SM-like $W$ and $Z$ as light KK states. Precision constraints, especially on the $S$ parameter, restrict the allowed scale of the heavy states and present a tension for simple fermion embeddings. Significance: demonstrates a calculable Higgsless mechanism with a simpler gauge-sector structure than previous proposals, highlighting both its promise for delaying unitarity violation and the challenges posed by electroweak precision data.

Abstract

We investigate unitarity of $W^+W^-$ scattering in the context of theory space models of the form $U(1)\times {[SU(2)]}^N\times SU(2)_{N+1}$, which are broken down to $U(1)_{EM}$ by non-linear $Σ$ fields, without the presence of a physical Higgs Boson. By allowing the couplings of the U(1) and the final $SU(2)_{N+1}$ to vary, we can fit the $W$ and $Z$ masses, and we find that the coefficient of the term in the amplitude that grows as $E^2/m_W^2$ at high energies is suppressed by a factor of $(N+1)^{-2}$. In the $N+1\to\infty$ limit the model becomes a 5-dimensional SU(2) gauge theory defined on an interval, where boundary terms at the two ends of the interval break the SU(2) down to $U(1)_{EM}$. These boundary terms also modify the Kaluza-Klein (KK) mass spectrum, so that the lightest KK states can be identified as the $W$ and $Z$ bosons. The $T$ parameter, which measures custodial symmetry breaking, is naturally small in these models. Depending on how matter fields are included, the strongest experimental constraints come from precision electroweak limits on the $S$ parameter.

Higgsless Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from Theory Space

TL;DR

Problem: achieve electroweak symmetry breaking without a Higgs while preserving unitarity in scattering. Approach: a deconstructed theory-space chain with nonlinear Sigma fields and tunable end couplings, whose heavy vector tower restores (delays) unitarity. Key findings: the leading energy-growing term scales as , so unitarity violation is postponed; in the limit the model becomes a 5D gauge theory on an interval with boundary terms, yielding SM-like and as light KK states. Precision constraints, especially on the parameter, restrict the allowed scale of the heavy states and present a tension for simple fermion embeddings. Significance: demonstrates a calculable Higgsless mechanism with a simpler gauge-sector structure than previous proposals, highlighting both its promise for delaying unitarity violation and the challenges posed by electroweak precision data.

Abstract

We investigate unitarity of scattering in the context of theory space models of the form , which are broken down to by non-linear fields, without the presence of a physical Higgs Boson. By allowing the couplings of the U(1) and the final to vary, we can fit the and masses, and we find that the coefficient of the term in the amplitude that grows as at high energies is suppressed by a factor of . In the limit the model becomes a 5-dimensional SU(2) gauge theory defined on an interval, where boundary terms at the two ends of the interval break the SU(2) down to . These boundary terms also modify the Kaluza-Klein (KK) mass spectrum, so that the lightest KK states can be identified as the and bosons. The parameter, which measures custodial symmetry breaking, is naturally small in these models. Depending on how matter fields are included, the strongest experimental constraints come from precision electroweak limits on the parameter.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 59 equations.