Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quarkonium Spectroscopy and Perturbative QCD: A New Perspective

N. Brambilla, Y. Sumino, A. Vairo

TL;DR

Brambilla, Sumino, and Vairo test the applicability of perturbative QCD to heavy quarkonia by reformulating quarkonium energies in terms of short-distance $\overline{MS}$ masses via an $\varepsilon$-expansion that cancels renormalons. Using $\alpha_s^{(5)}(M_Z)=0.1181 \pm 0.0020$ and fixing $m_b^{\overline{MS}}(m_b^{\overline{MS}})$ from the Υ(1S) mass, they compute the bottomonium spectrum and compare to data, finding good agreement for states where $\alpha_s(\mu)$ remains below unity and providing upper bounds on non-perturbative effects of order $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^3$-driven renormalons. The analysis yields a qualitative picture in which level spacings remain nearly constant with increasing principal quantum number due to state-dependent self-energy corrections, with the dominant physics governed by the region $1/a_X \lesssim q \lesssim \overline{m}$ in the heavy-quark self-energies. The work supports a perturbative description of several bottomonium levels (up to $n\approx 3$) and suggests that non-perturbative effects are encoding in non-local condensates that reduce to local forms for ground states, while charmonium predictions remain more limited.

Abstract

We study the energy spectrum of bottomonium in perturbative QCD, taking alpha_s(Mz)=0.1181 +/- 0.0020 as input and fixing m_b^{MSbar}(m_b^{MSbar}) on the Upsilon(1S) mass. Contrary to wide beliefs, perturbative QCD reproduces reasonably well the gross structure of the spectrum as long as the coupling constant remains smaller than one. We perform a detailed analysis and discuss the size of non-perturbative effects. A new qualitative picture on the structure of the bottomonium spectrum is provided. The lowest-lying (c,cbar) and (b,cbar) states are also examined.

Quarkonium Spectroscopy and Perturbative QCD: A New Perspective

TL;DR

Brambilla, Sumino, and Vairo test the applicability of perturbative QCD to heavy quarkonia by reformulating quarkonium energies in terms of short-distance masses via an -expansion that cancels renormalons. Using and fixing from the Υ(1S) mass, they compute the bottomonium spectrum and compare to data, finding good agreement for states where remains below unity and providing upper bounds on non-perturbative effects of order -driven renormalons. The analysis yields a qualitative picture in which level spacings remain nearly constant with increasing principal quantum number due to state-dependent self-energy corrections, with the dominant physics governed by the region in the heavy-quark self-energies. The work supports a perturbative description of several bottomonium levels (up to ) and suggests that non-perturbative effects are encoding in non-local condensates that reduce to local forms for ground states, while charmonium predictions remain more limited.

Abstract

We study the energy spectrum of bottomonium in perturbative QCD, taking alpha_s(Mz)=0.1181 +/- 0.0020 as input and fixing m_b^{MSbar}(m_b^{MSbar}) on the Upsilon(1S) mass. Contrary to wide beliefs, perturbative QCD reproduces reasonably well the gross structure of the spectrum as long as the coupling constant remains smaller than one. We perform a detailed analysis and discuss the size of non-perturbative effects. A new qualitative picture on the structure of the bottomonium spectrum is provided. The lowest-lying (c,cbar) and (b,cbar) states are also examined.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 13 equations, 2 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: The bottomonium level structure as given by a pure Coulombic potential, by experiments and by the present analysis: the solid and dashed lines represent the $S$-states and $P$-states, respectively. The input parameter of the perturbative QCD calculation is $\alpha_{\rm s}^{(5)}(M_Z)=0.1181$ (see Tab. \ref{['table:spectra']}). We show only those levels that we can compute reliably. The Coulomb levels are calculated with $m_{\rm pole}=5.105$ GeV and $\alpha_{\rm s}=0.5752$ such that they reproduce the $1S$ and $2S$ levels.
  • Figure 2: The support functions $f_X(q)$ vs. $q$ for $X = 1S$, $2S$ and $3S$ (solid lines). $f_X(q)$ is calculated using $m_{\rm pole}=5$ GeV and a different $\alpha_{\rm s}(\mu_X)$, taken from Tab. \ref{['table:spectra']}, for each $X$. Vertical lines represent the corresponding scales $\mu_X$ taken from the same table. Also $\alpha_{\rm s}^{(4)}(q)$ is shown by a dashed line.