Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Thermalisation after inflation

Sacha Davidson, Subir Sarkar

TL;DR

The paper investigates how inflaton decay products thermalise after inflation, focusing on whether energy loss and particle production occur rapidly enough to establish a thermal bath at the reheating temperature $T_{\rm reh}$. It shows that elastic $2\to2$ scattering, while infrared-enhanced, transfers energy slowly, whereas inelastic $2\to3$ processes efficiently generate gauge bosons and absorb energy, yielding a thermalisation rate $\Gamma_{\rm inel} \sim \alpha^3 T_{\rm reh}^2 / m_{\phi}$ and a thermalisation timescale $\tau_{\rm therm} \sim (\alpha^3 n_{\phi}/T_{\rm reh}^2)^{-1}$. The analysis indicates that reheating to $T_{\rm reh}$ via $2\to3$ interactions is feasible for plausible parameter ranges (e.g., $m_{\phi} \lesssim \alpha^3 M_{\rm Pl}$), and that soft inelastic processes play a crucial role in achieving kinetic and chemical equilibrium. Overall, the work highlights the primacy of inelastic scattering in setting the early-universe thermal history and has implications for baryogenesis and relic abundances tied to reheating.

Abstract

During (re)heating of the universe after inflation, the relativistic decay products of the inflaton field $φ$ must lose energy and additional particles must be produced to attain a thermalised state at a temperature $T_{\reh}$. We estimate the rate of energy loss via elastic and inelastic scattering interactions. Elastic scattering is an inefficient energy loss mechanism so inelastic processes, although higher order in the coupling $α$, can be faster because more energy is transfered. The timescale to produce a particle number density of ${\cal O}(T_{\reh}^3)$ is the inelastic energy loss timescale, $\sim(α^3 n_φ/T_{\reh}^2)^{-1}$.

Thermalisation after inflation

TL;DR

The paper investigates how inflaton decay products thermalise after inflation, focusing on whether energy loss and particle production occur rapidly enough to establish a thermal bath at the reheating temperature . It shows that elastic scattering, while infrared-enhanced, transfers energy slowly, whereas inelastic processes efficiently generate gauge bosons and absorb energy, yielding a thermalisation rate and a thermalisation timescale . The analysis indicates that reheating to via interactions is feasible for plausible parameter ranges (e.g., ), and that soft inelastic processes play a crucial role in achieving kinetic and chemical equilibrium. Overall, the work highlights the primacy of inelastic scattering in setting the early-universe thermal history and has implications for baryogenesis and relic abundances tied to reheating.

Abstract

During (re)heating of the universe after inflation, the relativistic decay products of the inflaton field must lose energy and additional particles must be produced to attain a thermalised state at a temperature . We estimate the rate of energy loss via elastic and inelastic scattering interactions. Elastic scattering is an inefficient energy loss mechanism so inelastic processes, although higher order in the coupling , can be faster because more energy is transfered. The timescale to produce a particle number density of is the inelastic energy loss timescale, .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 24 equations, 1 figure.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: $\chi$ scattering. Time runs from left to right