Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Non-Baryonic Dark Matter - Observational Evidence and Detection Methods

L. Bergstrom

TL;DR

This review analyzes how the universe's energy budget is partitioned among baryons, non-baryonic dark matter, and vacuum energy within the standard big bang framework. It argues that inflation drives a flat geometry ( $Ω_{tot} ≈ 1$ ) and that combining SN Ia, CMB, LSS, and gravitational lensing data yields $Ω_M ≈ 0.3–0.4$ and $Ω_\Lambda ≈ 0.6–0.7$. It reviews relic-particle production, including thermal freeze-out of WIMPs with $Ω_χ h^2 ≈ 3×10^{-27} / \langle σ_A v \rangle$ and non-thermal production scenarios, as well as potential axion and massive neutrino contributions. The paper also discusses detection strategies and notes that current experiments are nearing the sensitivity needed to test leading non-baryonic DM candidates, underscoring a ΛCDM-like cosmology with non-baryonic DM.

Abstract

The evidence for the existence of dark matter in the universe is reviewed. A general picture emerges, where both baryonic and non-baryonic dark matter is needed to explain current observations. In particular, a wealth of observational information points to the existence of a non-baryonic component, contributing between around 20 and 40 percent of the critical mass density needed to make the universe geometrically flat on large scales. In addition, an even larger contribution from vacuum energy (or cosmological constant) is indicated by recent observations. To the theoretically favoured particle candidates for non-baryonic dark matter belong axions, supersymmetric particles, and of less importance, massive neutrinos. The theoretical foundation and experimental situation for each of these is reviewed. Direct and indirect methods for detection of supersymmetric dark matter are described in some detail. Present experiments are just reaching the required sensitivity to discover or rule out some of these candidates, and major improvements are planned over the coming years.

Non-Baryonic Dark Matter - Observational Evidence and Detection Methods

TL;DR

This review analyzes how the universe's energy budget is partitioned among baryons, non-baryonic dark matter, and vacuum energy within the standard big bang framework. It argues that inflation drives a flat geometry ( ) and that combining SN Ia, CMB, LSS, and gravitational lensing data yields and . It reviews relic-particle production, including thermal freeze-out of WIMPs with and non-thermal production scenarios, as well as potential axion and massive neutrino contributions. The paper also discusses detection strategies and notes that current experiments are nearing the sensitivity needed to test leading non-baryonic DM candidates, underscoring a ΛCDM-like cosmology with non-baryonic DM.

Abstract

The evidence for the existence of dark matter in the universe is reviewed. A general picture emerges, where both baryonic and non-baryonic dark matter is needed to explain current observations. In particular, a wealth of observational information points to the existence of a non-baryonic component, contributing between around 20 and 40 percent of the critical mass density needed to make the universe geometrically flat on large scales. In addition, an even larger contribution from vacuum energy (or cosmological constant) is indicated by recent observations. To the theoretically favoured particle candidates for non-baryonic dark matter belong axions, supersymmetric particles, and of less importance, massive neutrinos. The theoretical foundation and experimental situation for each of these is reviewed. Direct and indirect methods for detection of supersymmetric dark matter are described in some detail. Present experiments are just reaching the required sensitivity to discover or rule out some of these candidates, and major improvements are planned over the coming years.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 28 equations, 2 figures.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Best-fit coincidence regions in the $\Omega_{\rm M}$--$\Omega_\Lambda$ plane from the analysis of the Supernova Cosmology Projectariel. The dark and light ellipses show the 68 per cent and 90 per cent confidence regions. A flat Universe ($\Omega_{\rm K}=0$) would fall on top of the diagonal solid line passing through the prediction from inflation $\Omega_0=\Omega_M+\Omega_\Lambda=1$. To the right of that line the Universe is closed, and to the left it is open. The dashed line shows the division between acceleration and deceleration for the Universe. Also shown are isochrones of constant age. Figure kindly provided by A. Goobar, The Supernova Cosmology Project ariel.
  • Figure :