Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Scaling and the Fractal Geometry of Two-Dimensional Quantum Gravity

S. Catterall, G. Thorleifsson, M. Bowick, V. John

TL;DR

This work investigates the fractal geometry of two-dimensional quantum gravity by examining geodesic correlation functions on dynamical triangulations. Using finite-size scaling, the authors identify a non-perturbative length scale $l_G$ and extract the Hausdorff dimension $d_H$, finding $d_H \approx 3.83$ for pure gravity, in line with the theoretical value $d_H=4$, and observe broadly similar $d_H$ when simple spins are coupled to gravity, with limited evidence of back-reaction within current finite-size limits. Analytic discussions of $d_H$ from continuum Liouville theory and matrix models reveal multiple proposed formulas that sometimes disagree for certain minimal models, underscoring ambiguities in defining fractal dimensions on fluctuating geometries. The results support a scaling picture with a dynamically generated length scale, but also motivate a two-scale hypothesis and further high-resolution simulations to resolve potential back-reaction effects and model-dependent discrepancies.

Abstract

We examine the scaling of geodesic correlation functions in two-dimensional gravity and in spin systems coupled to gravity. The numerical data support the scaling hypothesis and indicate that the quantum geometry develops a non-perturbative length scale. The existence of this length scale allows us to extract a Hausdorff dimension. In the case of pure gravity we find d_H approx. 3.8, in support of recent theoretical calculations that d_H = 4. We also discuss the back-reaction of matter on the geometry.

Scaling and the Fractal Geometry of Two-Dimensional Quantum Gravity

TL;DR

This work investigates the fractal geometry of two-dimensional quantum gravity by examining geodesic correlation functions on dynamical triangulations. Using finite-size scaling, the authors identify a non-perturbative length scale and extract the Hausdorff dimension , finding for pure gravity, in line with the theoretical value , and observe broadly similar when simple spins are coupled to gravity, with limited evidence of back-reaction within current finite-size limits. Analytic discussions of from continuum Liouville theory and matrix models reveal multiple proposed formulas that sometimes disagree for certain minimal models, underscoring ambiguities in defining fractal dimensions on fluctuating geometries. The results support a scaling picture with a dynamically generated length scale, but also motivate a two-scale hypothesis and further high-resolution simulations to resolve potential back-reaction effects and model-dependent discrepancies.

Abstract

We examine the scaling of geodesic correlation functions in two-dimensional gravity and in spin systems coupled to gravity. The numerical data support the scaling hypothesis and indicate that the quantum geometry develops a non-perturbative length scale. The existence of this length scale allows us to extract a Hausdorff dimension. In the case of pure gravity we find d_H approx. 3.8, in support of recent theoretical calculations that d_H = 4. We also discuss the back-reaction of matter on the geometry.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 22 equations, 4 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Volume scaling of (${\it a}$) the location of the peak $r_0$ in the distributions $n(r,N)$ and ( b) their maximal value $n(r_0)$ in the case of pure gravity. Data is shown both for the direct and dual lattices and the extracted values of $d_H$ are included.
  • Figure 2: Scaling plots for the point-point distributions $n(r,N)$ in the case of pure gravity; (a) the direct and (b) dual lattice. Shown are the curves fitted to distributions after rescaling. The value of $d_H$ is chosen so as it minimized the total chi-square of the fits.
  • Figure 3: Volume scaling for $r_0$ and $n(r_0)$ for the distributions we measured for Ising model coupled to gravity. The same scaling behavior is used to extract $d_H$ from the slope as in the case of pure gravity, except for $g_{un}(r_0)$. There we used $n(r_0)\sim \gamma/\nu d_H - 1/d_H$, substituting the exact values for $\gamma/\nu d_H$.
  • Figure 4: Collapsing the data for $n(r,N)$ and $g_{un}(r,N)$ on a single curve using one scaling parameter in the case of an Ising model coupled to gravity.