Theoretical issues with staggered fermion simulations
Stephan Durr
TL;DR
The paper analyzes whether dynamical staggered fermions with rooting, $\det^{1/4}(D_{\mathrm{st}})$, reproduce the correct nonperturbative continuum limit and emphasizes locality as the key nonperturbative hurdle. It surveys the staggered action’s taste structure, presents several free-theory constructions for a local candidate action $D_{\mathrm{ca}}$ with the correct determinant, and surveys spectral, topological, and effective-field-theory evidence from 4D and 2D theories. Results show encouraging but inconclusive support for rooting: improved actions and filtering reduce taste breaking, overlap-staggered determinant correlations improve with finer lattices, and SXPT can describe rooted data, yet no general proof exists. The work underscores the need for a proven local, doubler-free candidate action or a robust counterexample and highlights the practical implications for lattice QCD with ${N_f}=2+1$ quarks.
Abstract
The legality of the "rooting trick" in dynamical staggered fermion simulations is discussed, i.e. whether the theory with the Boltzmann weight $\det^{1/4}(D_\mathrm{st})$ yields the right continuum limit. Since the problem is unsolved, pieces of evidence in favor and against are collected and examined.
