Table of Contents
Fetching ...

$J/ψ$ and $η_c$ in the Deconfined Plasma from Lattice QCD

M. Asakawa, T. Hatsuda

TL;DR

Analyzing correlation functions of charmonia at finite temperature (T) on 32(3)x(32-96) anisotropic lattices by the maximum entropy method (MEM) finds that J/psi and eta(c) survive as distinct resonances in the plasma even up to T approximately 1.6T(c), which suggests that the deconfined plasma is nonperturbative enough to hold heavy-quark bound states.

Abstract

Analyzing correlation functions of charmonia at finite temperature ($T$) on $32^3\times(32-96)$ anisotropic lattices by the maximum entropy method (MEM), we find that $J/ψ$ and $η_c$ survive as distinct resonances in the plasma even up to $T \simeq 1.6 T_c$ and that they eventually dissociate between $1.6 T_c$ and $1.9 T_c$ ($T_c$ is the critical temperature of deconfinement). This suggests that the deconfined plasma is non-perturbative enough to hold heavy-quark bound states. The importance of having sufficient number of temporal data points in MEM analyses is also emphasized.

$J/ψ$ and $η_c$ in the Deconfined Plasma from Lattice QCD

TL;DR

Analyzing correlation functions of charmonia at finite temperature (T) on 32(3)x(32-96) anisotropic lattices by the maximum entropy method (MEM) finds that J/psi and eta(c) survive as distinct resonances in the plasma even up to T approximately 1.6T(c), which suggests that the deconfined plasma is nonperturbative enough to hold heavy-quark bound states.

Abstract

Analyzing correlation functions of charmonia at finite temperature () on anisotropic lattices by the maximum entropy method (MEM), we find that and survive as distinct resonances in the plasma even up to and that they eventually dissociate between and ( is the critical temperature of deconfinement). This suggests that the deconfined plasma is non-perturbative enough to hold heavy-quark bound states. The importance of having sufficient number of temporal data points in MEM analyses is also emphasized.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 equations, 4 figures, 1 table.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Spectral functions for $J/\psi$ (a) for $T/T_c=0.78, 1.38$, and $1.62$ (b) for $T/T_c=1.87$ and $2.33$.
  • Figure 2: Spectral functions for $\eta_c$ (a) for $T/T_c=0.78, 1.38$, and $1.62$ (b) for $T/T_c=1.87$ and $2.33$.
  • Figure 3: Spectral functions for $J/\psi$ with MEM errors (a) for $T/T_c=1.62$ (b) $T/T_c=1.87$.
  • Figure 4: Comparison of the SPF for $J/\psi$ (a) for $N_{\rm data} = 34$ and 39 with $N_{\tau}=46$$(T/T_c=1.62)$ (b) for $N_{\rm data} =26$ and 33 with $N_{\tau}=40$$(T/T_c=1.87)$.