Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Charged particle multiplicity near mid-rapidity in central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 56 and 130 AGeV

B. B. Back, PHOBOS Collaboration

Abstract

We present the first measurement of pseudorapidity densities of primary charged particles near mid-rapidity in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 56 and 130 AGeV. For the most central collisions, we find the charged particle pseudorapidity density to be $dN/dη|_{|η|<1} = 408 \pm 12 {(stat)} \pm 30 {(syst)}$ at 56 AGeV and $555 \pm 12 {(stat)} \pm 35 {(syst)}$ at 130 AGeV, values that are higher than any previously observed in nuclear collisions. Compared to proton-antiproton collisions, our data show an increase in the pseudorapidity density per participant by more than 40% at the higher energy.

Charged particle multiplicity near mid-rapidity in central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 56 and 130 AGeV

Abstract

We present the first measurement of pseudorapidity densities of primary charged particles near mid-rapidity in Au+Au collisions at 56 and 130 AGeV. For the most central collisions, we find the charged particle pseudorapidity density to be at 56 AGeV and at 130 AGeV, values that are higher than any previously observed in nuclear collisions. Compared to proton-antiproton collisions, our data show an increase in the pseudorapidity density per participant by more than 40% at the higher energy.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Detector setup for the initial running period. The insert shows the $\eta$ acceptance of the SPEC and VTX subdetectors as a function of primary vertex position.
  • Figure 2: Paddle signal distribution for data events at $\sqrt{s} =$ 130 AGeV.
  • Figure 3: Tracklet pseudorapidity density in the detector acceptance per event for data at $\sqrt{s} =$ 56 (circles) and 130 AGeV (triangles) for SPEC (left) and VTX (right), in comparison to scaled HIJING simulations (solid lines).
  • Figure 4: Measured pseudorapidity density normalized per participant pair for central Au+Au collisions. Systematic errors are shown as shaded area. Data are compared with $p\overline{p}$ data and Pb+Pb data from the CERN SPS. Also shown are results of a HIJING simulation (with a line to guide the eye) and a parametrization of the $p\overline{p}$ data [7].