Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantum Gravity in 2+1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe

S. Carlip

TL;DR

This review shows that quantum gravity in $2+1$ dimensions, despite lacking local degrees of freedom, remains richly structured, with global data encoded in holonomies and moduli. It surveys a spectrum of quantization approaches—reduced phase space, Chern-Simons, covariant canonical, loop, and lattice/spin-foam methods—highlighting both their successes and fundamental nonuniqueness, especially in the presence of large diffeomorphisms and topology changes. The torus universe serves as a concrete testing ground where explicit quantizations reveal connections between moduli-space dynamics, Maass operators, and modular invariance, while general genus cases and path-integral treatments expose challenges such as divergences in topology sums and the problem of time. Overall, the work positions $2+1$ gravity as a crucial, though nontrivial, laboratory for exploring how different quantum gravity frameworks relate to each other and what lessons might carry over to the physical $3+1$ theory.

Abstract

In three spacetime dimensions, general relativity drastically simplifies, becoming a ``topological'' theory with no propagating local degrees of freedom. Nevertheless, many of the difficult conceptual problems of quantizing gravity are still present. In this review, I summarize the rather large body of work that has gone towards quantizing (2+1)-dimensional vacuum gravity in the setting of a spatially closed universe.

Quantum Gravity in 2+1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe

TL;DR

This review shows that quantum gravity in dimensions, despite lacking local degrees of freedom, remains richly structured, with global data encoded in holonomies and moduli. It surveys a spectrum of quantization approaches—reduced phase space, Chern-Simons, covariant canonical, loop, and lattice/spin-foam methods—highlighting both their successes and fundamental nonuniqueness, especially in the presence of large diffeomorphisms and topology changes. The torus universe serves as a concrete testing ground where explicit quantizations reveal connections between moduli-space dynamics, Maass operators, and modular invariance, while general genus cases and path-integral treatments expose challenges such as divergences in topology sums and the problem of time. Overall, the work positions gravity as a crucial, though nontrivial, laboratory for exploring how different quantum gravity frameworks relate to each other and what lessons might carry over to the physical theory.

Abstract

In three spacetime dimensions, general relativity drastically simplifies, becoming a ``topological'' theory with no propagating local degrees of freedom. Nevertheless, many of the difficult conceptual problems of quantizing gravity are still present. In this review, I summarize the rather large body of work that has gone towards quantizing (2+1)-dimensional vacuum gravity in the setting of a spatially closed universe.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 24 sections, 71 equations, 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: The curve $\gamma$ is covered by coordinate patches $U_i$, with transition functions $g_i \in G$. The composition $g_1\circ \dots\circ g_n$ is the holonomy of the curve.
  • Figure 2: The ADM decomposition is based on the Lorentzian version of the Pythagoras theorem.
  • Figure 3: Three tetrahedra can occur in Lorentzian dynamical triangulation.
  • Figure 4: A manifold $M$ with a single boundary $\Sigma$ describes the birth of a universe in the Hartle--Hawking approach to quantum cosmology.