Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An estimate of accuracy for interpolant numerical solutions of a PDE problem

Gianluca Argentini

TL;DR

This work presents an a priori error estimate for a piecewise cubic interpolant $V$ built from a coarse Euler-forward-in-time, centered-in-space solution of a nonlinear scalar conservation-law PDE, comparing it to a finer-grid solution $U$. By employing cubic Hermite-type interpolation on each coarse cell and enforcing a CFL-stability framework, the authors derive a concrete bound for the interpolant error that scales linearly with the coarse spatial step $h$, given a controllable initial-data condition. They further show that, under certain conditions (including linear flux and turbulence-like scenarios), the interpolant inherits stability properties and provides uniform spatial error control, offering a cost-effective alternative to solving on the finer grid. The results connect to classical finite-element error analyses and quantify the trade-off between accuracy and computational cost for interpolated, lower-resolution solutions.

Abstract

In this paper we present an estimate of accuracy for a piecewise polynomial approximation of a classical numerical solution to a non linear differential problem. We suppose the numerical solution U is computed using a grid with a small linear step and interval time Tu, while the polynomial approximation V is an interpolation of the values of a numerical solution on a less fine grid and interval time Tv << Tu. The estimate shows that the interpolant solution V can be, under suitable hypotheses, a good approximation and in general its computational cost is much lower of the cost of the fine numerical solution. We present two possible applications to linear case and periodic case.

An estimate of accuracy for interpolant numerical solutions of a PDE problem

TL;DR

This work presents an a priori error estimate for a piecewise cubic interpolant built from a coarse Euler-forward-in-time, centered-in-space solution of a nonlinear scalar conservation-law PDE, comparing it to a finer-grid solution . By employing cubic Hermite-type interpolation on each coarse cell and enforcing a CFL-stability framework, the authors derive a concrete bound for the interpolant error that scales linearly with the coarse spatial step , given a controllable initial-data condition. They further show that, under certain conditions (including linear flux and turbulence-like scenarios), the interpolant inherits stability properties and provides uniform spatial error control, offering a cost-effective alternative to solving on the finer grid. The results connect to classical finite-element error analyses and quantify the trade-off between accuracy and computational cost for interpolated, lower-resolution solutions.

Abstract

In this paper we present an estimate of accuracy for a piecewise polynomial approximation of a classical numerical solution to a non linear differential problem. We suppose the numerical solution U is computed using a grid with a small linear step and interval time Tu, while the polynomial approximation V is an interpolation of the values of a numerical solution on a less fine grid and interval time Tv << Tu. The estimate shows that the interpolant solution V can be, under suitable hypotheses, a good approximation and in general its computational cost is much lower of the cost of the fine numerical solution. We present two possible applications to linear case and periodic case.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 18 theorems, 40 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Proposition 1

If $t\in [0,1]$, exists a value $s\in [0,1]$ such that

Figures (1)

  • Figure :

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • Proposition 1
  • Proposition 2
  • Proposition 3
  • Proposition 4
  • Proposition 5
  • Proposition 6
  • Corollary 1
  • Corollary 2
  • Proposition 7
  • Proposition 8
  • ...and 8 more