Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Radical Compression of Cosmic Microwave Background Data

J. R. Bond, A. H. Jaffe, L. E. Knox

TL;DR

The paper tackles biases arising from Gaussian likelihood assumptions when compressing CMB data by introducing radical compression via bandpowers and non-Gaussian likelihoods. It develops two practical approximations—the offset lognormal form and the equal-variance form—for the bandpower likelihood, each incorporating a noise-offset parameter $x$ to capture non-Gaussian tails. The methods are tested on COBE/DMR, Saskatoon, OVRO, SP, and SuZIE datasets, yielding robust maximum-likelihood power spectra and cosmological constraints that closely match full likelihoods and reduce biases. This approach enables simple, scalable, and joint analyses of diverse CMB datasets, with a clear pathway for reporting results that preserve non-Gaussian information and facilitate parameter estimation.

Abstract

Powerful constraints on theories can already be inferred from existing CMB anisotropy data. But performing an exact analysis of available data is a complicated task and may become prohibitively so for upcoming experiments with \gtrsim10^4 pixels. We present a method for approximating the likelihood that takes power spectrum constraints, e.g., ``band-powers'', as inputs. We identify a bias which results if one approximates the probability distribution of the band-power errors as Gaussian---as is the usual practice. This bias can be eliminated by using specific approximations to the non-Gaussian form for the distribution specified by three parameters (the maximum likelihood or mode, curvature or variance, and a third quantity). We advocate the calculation of this third quantity by experimenters, to be presented along with the maximum-likelihood band-power and variance. We use this non-Gaussian form to estimate the power spectrum of the CMB in eleven bands from multipole moment ell = 2 (the quadrupole) to ell=3000 from all published band-power data. We investigate the robustness of our power spectrum estimate to changes in these approximations as well as to selective editing of the data.

Radical Compression of Cosmic Microwave Background Data

TL;DR

The paper tackles biases arising from Gaussian likelihood assumptions when compressing CMB data by introducing radical compression via bandpowers and non-Gaussian likelihoods. It develops two practical approximations—the offset lognormal form and the equal-variance form—for the bandpower likelihood, each incorporating a noise-offset parameter to capture non-Gaussian tails. The methods are tested on COBE/DMR, Saskatoon, OVRO, SP, and SuZIE datasets, yielding robust maximum-likelihood power spectra and cosmological constraints that closely match full likelihoods and reduce biases. This approach enables simple, scalable, and joint analyses of diverse CMB datasets, with a clear pathway for reporting results that preserve non-Gaussian information and facilitate parameter estimation.

Abstract

Powerful constraints on theories can already be inferred from existing CMB anisotropy data. But performing an exact analysis of available data is a complicated task and may become prohibitively so for upcoming experiments with \gtrsim10^4 pixels. We present a method for approximating the likelihood that takes power spectrum constraints, e.g., ``band-powers'', as inputs. We identify a bias which results if one approximates the probability distribution of the band-power errors as Gaussian---as is the usual practice. This bias can be eliminated by using specific approximations to the non-Gaussian form for the distribution specified by three parameters (the maximum likelihood or mode, curvature or variance, and a third quantity). We advocate the calculation of this third quantity by experimenters, to be presented along with the maximum-likelihood band-power and variance. We use this non-Gaussian form to estimate the power spectrum of the CMB in eleven bands from multipole moment ell = 2 (the quadrupole) to ell=3000 from all published band-power data. We investigate the robustness of our power spectrum estimate to changes in these approximations as well as to selective editing of the data.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 22 sections, 49 equations, 11 figures, 1 table.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: DMR Likelihoods $P(\Delta|{\cal C}_\ell$) for various values of $\ell$, as marked. The horizontal axis is ${\cal C}_\ell=\ell(\ell+1)C_\ell/(2\pi)$. The upper right panel gives the cumulative probability. The solid (black) line is the full likelihood calculated exactly. The dashed (red) line is the Gaussian approximation about the peak.
  • Figure 2: Full and approximate COBE/DMR likelihoods $P(\Delta|{\cal C}_\ell)$ for various values of $\ell$, as marked. The horizontal axis is ${\cal C}_\ell=\ell(\ell+1)C_\ell/(2\pi)$. The upper right panel gives the cumulative probability. The solid (black) line is the full likelihood calculated exactly. The short-dashed (red) line is the Gaussian approximation about the peak. The dotted (cyan) line is a Gaussian in $\ln{{\cal C}_\ell}$; the dashed (magenta) line is a Gaussian in $\ln{({\cal C}_\ell+x_\ell)}$, as discussed in the text. The dot-dashed (green) line is the equal-variance approximation.
  • Figure 3: Exact and approximate likelihood contours for COBE/DMR, for the cosmological parameters $n_s$ and $\sigma_8$ (with otherwise standard CDM values). Contours are for ratios of the likelihood to its maximum equal to $\exp{-\nu^2/2}$ with $\nu=1,2,3$. Upper panel is for the full likelihood (dashed) and its offset lognormal approximation as a Gaussian in $\ln{({\cal C}_\ell+x_\ell)}$ (solid; see text); lower panel shows the full likelihood and its approximation as a Gaussian in ${\cal C}_\ell$.
  • Figure 4: Full and approximate Saskatoon likelihoods. As in Fig. \ref{['fig:dmrlike']}. The solid (black) line is the full likelihood calculated exactly. The short-dashed (red) line is the Gaussian approximation about the peak. The dotted (cyan) line is a Gaussian in $\ln{{\cal C}_\ell}$; the dashed (magenta) line is a Gaussian in $\ln{({\cal C}_\ell+x_\ell)}$, as discussed in the text. The dot-dashed (green) line is the equal-variance approximation.
  • Figure 5: Likelihood contours for the Saskatoon experiment alone, as in Figure \ref{['fig:dmrlikecontours']}, but using the "orthogonalized bands" of Sec. \ref{['sec:ortho']}.
  • ...and 6 more figures