Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A new cosmic microwave background constraint to primordial gravitational waves

Tristan L. Smith, Elena Pierpaoli, Marc Kamionkowski

TL;DR

Current observations provide a constraint to the GW amplitude that competes with that from big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), although it extends to much lower frequencies (approximately 10(-15) Hz rather than the approximately 10(-10) Hz from BBN).

Abstract

Primordial gravitational waves (GWs) with frequencies > 10^{-15} Hz contribute to the radiation density of the Universe at the time of decoupling of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The effects of this GW background on the CMB and matter power spectra are identical to those due to massless neutrinos, unless the initial density-perturbation amplitude for the gravitational-wave gas is non-adiabatic, as may occur if such GWs are produced during inflation or some post-inflation phase transition. In either case, current observations provide a constraint to the GW amplitude that competes with that from big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), although it extends to much lower frequencies (~10^{-15} Hz rather than the ~10^{-10} Hz lower limit from BBN): at 95% confidence-level, Omega_gw h^2 < 6.9 x 10^{-6} for homogeneous (i.e., non-adiabatic) initial conditions. Future CMB experiments, like Planck and CMBPol, should allow sensitivities to Omega_gw h^2 < 1.4 x 10^{-6} and Omega_gw h^2 < 5 x 10^{-7}, respectively.

A new cosmic microwave background constraint to primordial gravitational waves

TL;DR

Current observations provide a constraint to the GW amplitude that competes with that from big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), although it extends to much lower frequencies (approximately 10(-15) Hz rather than the approximately 10(-10) Hz from BBN).

Abstract

Primordial gravitational waves (GWs) with frequencies > 10^{-15} Hz contribute to the radiation density of the Universe at the time of decoupling of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The effects of this GW background on the CMB and matter power spectra are identical to those due to massless neutrinos, unless the initial density-perturbation amplitude for the gravitational-wave gas is non-adiabatic, as may occur if such GWs are produced during inflation or some post-inflation phase transition. In either case, current observations provide a constraint to the GW amplitude that competes with that from big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), although it extends to much lower frequencies (~10^{-15} Hz rather than the ~10^{-10} Hz lower limit from BBN): at 95% confidence-level, Omega_gw h^2 < 6.9 x 10^{-6} for homogeneous (i.e., non-adiabatic) initial conditions. Future CMB experiments, like Planck and CMBPol, should allow sensitivities to Omega_gw h^2 < 1.4 x 10^{-6} and Omega_gw h^2 < 5 x 10^{-7}, respectively.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 figures, 1 table.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Adiabatic: The marginalized (unnormalized) likelihoods for the CGWB energy density if perturbations to the CGWB density are adiabatic. The dotted curve is the result obtained using only CMB data. The thick solid curve includes galaxies as well as the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest. In all of the aforementioned curves, the marginalization is over the nonrelativistic-matter density $\Omega_m h^2$, baryon density $\Omega_b h^2$, scalar spectral index $n_s$, power-spectrum amplitude $A_s$, the optical depth $\tau$ to the surface of last scatter, and the angle $\theta$ subtended by the first acoustic peak (marginalization over $\theta$ essentially stands in for marginalization over the Hubble constant). We hold the geometry fixed to flat, the number of neutrinos to $N_\nu=3.04$, and the neutrino masses fixed to zero. Finally, the dot-dash curve (to the right) shows current constraints from the CMB+galaxies+Ly$\alpha$ if we allow for and marginalize over nonzero neutrino masses as well. The number of equivalent neutrino degrees of freedom ($N_{\mathrm{gw}}$) is shown on the bottom axis. Homogeneous: same as the left panel, except for homogeneous initial conditions for the CGWB. The arrow indicates the 95% CL upper limit $\Omega_{\mathrm{gw}}h^2 \leq 6.9 \times 10^{-6}$ that we adopt as our central result. This is obtained from the analysis that includes current CMB+galaxy+Ly$\alpha$+free $m_{\nu}$.
  • Figure 2: The gravitational-wave density $\Omega_{\mathrm{gw}} h^2$ versus frequency. The BBN constraint corresponds to a limit of 1.4 extra neutrino degrees of freedom. We also show our constraints, from current CMB, galaxy, and Lyman-$\alpha$ data, for a CGWB with adiabatic primordial perturbations ("Adiabatic (current)") and for homogeneous initial conditions ("Homogeneous (current)"), as well as our forecasts for the sensitivities if current CMB data are replaced by data from CMBPol. Also shown are the reaches of LIGO and LISA. BBO (not shown) should go deeper, but primarily at frequencies $\sim1$ Hz. Large-angle CMB fluctuations (also not shown) constrain $\Omega_{\mathrm{gw}}h^2 \lesssim 10^{-14}$, but only at frequencies $\lesssim10^{-16}$ Hz. The LIGO S3 upper limit is from Ref. Abbott:2005ez and the msec pulsar curve is from Refs. Kaspi:1994hpLommen:2002je.