On The Nature of the Compact Dark Mass at the Galactic Center
Avery E. Broderick, Ramesh Narayan
TL;DR
The paper investigates whether Sgr A* could harbor a physical surface or must possess an event horizon. By treating a hypothetical surface as a thermally emitting body and using near-infrared flux limits along with GR-lensed surface area, it derives an upper bound on the accretion rate, $\dot M_{max}$, and compares it to the rate needed to power the observed luminosity; the result strongly disfavors a surface, suggesting an event horizon. Submillimeter VLBI imaging of a radiatively inefficient accretion flow shows that surface radii $R$ near or beyond the photon orbit produce detectable silhouettes, potentially constraining $R$ to $\lesssim 3M$ when combined with the NIR limits. The study concludes that, under reasonable assumptions, Sgr A* must have an event horizon, and future high-resolution imaging could further tighten the bounds on ultra-compact alternatives.
Abstract
We consider a model in which Sgr A*, the 3.5x10^6 M_sun supermassive black hole candidate at the Galactic Center, is a compact object with a surface. Given the very low quiescent luminosity of Sgr A* in the near infrared, the existence of a hard surface, even in the limit in which the radius approaches the horizon, places severe constraints upon the steady mass accretion rate in the source, requiring dM/dt < 10^-12 M_sun/yr. This limit is well below the minimum accretion rate needed to power the observed submillimeter luminosity of Sgr A*. We thus argue that Sgr A* does not have a surface, i.e., it must have an event horizon. The argument could be made more restrictive by an order of magnitude with microarcsecond resolution imaging, e.g., with submillimeter VLBI.
