Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Kinematic Constraints to the Key Inflationary Observables

Mark B. Hoffman, Michael S. Turner

TL;DR

The paper addresses the lack of a model-independent relation between the inflationary observables $T/S$ and $n-1$ by reformulating inflation in terms of flow equations for these quantities. These flow equations produce attractor behavior in the $T/S$--$(n-1)$ plane, with two main attractors at $T/S\approx 0$ and $T/S\approx -5(n-1)$, and an excluded region for $n<1$, especially when the potential curvature $x''$ is small (smooth potentials) leading to a 'favored' region. For sufficiently smooth potentials, the models cluster near these attractors, and as $n$ increases toward unity the allowed $T/S$ grows along the favored region; in particular, if $n>0.85$, then $T/S>10^{-3}$ is expected, increasing the prospects for detecting the gravity-wave signature. Deviations from the favored region require sizable $x''$, producing large running $dn/d\ln k$ and poorly power-law density spectra; two-field models can extend the attractor to $n>1$. Overall, this flow-trajectory framework provides practical guidance for interpreting CMB measurements and testing inflation by linking the scalar tilt to the tensor amplitude.

Abstract

The observables $T/S$ and $n-1$ are key to testing and understanding inflation. ($T$, $S$, and $n-1$ respectively quantify the gravity-wave and density-perturbation contributions to CMB anisotropy and the deviation of the density perturbations from the scale-invariant form.) Absent a standard model, there is no definite prediction for, or relation between, $T/S$ and $n-1$. By reformulating the equations governing inflation we show that models generally predict $T/S \approx -5(n-1)$ or 0, and in particular, if $n>0.85$, $T/S$ is expected to be $>10^{-3}$.

Kinematic Constraints to the Key Inflationary Observables

TL;DR

The paper addresses the lack of a model-independent relation between the inflationary observables and by reformulating inflation in terms of flow equations for these quantities. These flow equations produce attractor behavior in the -- plane, with two main attractors at and , and an excluded region for , especially when the potential curvature is small (smooth potentials) leading to a 'favored' region. For sufficiently smooth potentials, the models cluster near these attractors, and as increases toward unity the allowed grows along the favored region; in particular, if , then is expected, increasing the prospects for detecting the gravity-wave signature. Deviations from the favored region require sizable , producing large running and poorly power-law density spectra; two-field models can extend the attractor to . Overall, this flow-trajectory framework provides practical guidance for interpreting CMB measurements and testing inflation by linking the scalar tilt to the tensor amplitude.

Abstract

The observables and are key to testing and understanding inflation. (, , and respectively quantify the gravity-wave and density-perturbation contributions to CMB anisotropy and the deviation of the density perturbations from the scale-invariant form.) Absent a standard model, there is no definite prediction for, or relation between, and . By reformulating the equations governing inflation we show that models generally predict or 0, and in particular, if , is expected to be .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 1 section, 7 equations, 4 figures.

Table of Contents

  1. Acknowledgments.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Trajectories in the $T/S$ -- $(n-1)$ plane. Squares indicate the initial choices for $T/S$ and $(n-1)$; circles indicate the values 50 e-folds before the end of inflation. A trajectory ends when $T/S$ and/or $|n-1|$ become large; most of inflation occurs when $T/S$ and $|n-1|$ are small. The upper left panel shows a complete trajectory, with ticks indicating e-folds before the end of inflation (from the circle, $50, 49, \cdots , 1$). The other three panels show trajectories in more detail. Note how $T/S$ and $(n-1)$ outside the attractor region are "pulled in" (the attractors are shown as broken lines and the boundary of the excluded region is a solid curve).
  • Figure 2: Summary of our model search using the flow equations. The lines $T/S =-5(n-1)$ and $T/S=0$ act as attractors; the dotted curves correspond to $x^{\prime\prime} =0,1,2,5$ (from left to right). We found no model in the excluded region, and we call the region between it and the curve $x^{\prime\prime} =3$ the favored region. Models outside the favored region (upper right part) have large $dn/d\ln k$ and density perturbations that are not well represented by a power law. Diamonds indicate various known inflationary models: chaotic, $V(\phi )=\lambda\phi^n$ for $n=2,3,\cdots$ (diamonds on the diagonal); new inflation ($n=0.94$) and natural inflation (with $n=0.84$). The ellipse is the $2\sigma$ error ellipse "forecasted" for the PLANCK satellite Kinney.
  • Figure 3: Same as Fig. \ref{['fig:1fld']}, except with a logarithmic scale for $T/S$ to show more detail. As $n\rightarrow 1$, $T/S$ increases in the favored region. Below and to the left of the broken line ($dn/d\ln k =10^{-2}$), a poor power law does not occur for large $x^{\prime\prime}$ because $dn/d\ln k \propto \sqrt{T/S}\,x^{\prime\prime}$ and $T/S$ is small.
  • Figure 4: Summary of two-field models. The filled circles represent the values of $(T/S)_{50}$ and $n_{50}$ for the corresponding one-field models, and the attached curves are the values obtained for inflation ending early due to an auxiliary field. The dashed lines represent fixed points in the $(T/S)$ -- $n$ plane that result from models that do not end without an auxiliary field. In general, two-field models populate the same region as one-field models and extend the $T/S \approx 0$ attractor to $n > 1$.