Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Borda Aggregation Dynamics of Preference Orderings on Networks

Moses Boudourides

Abstract

We introduce and analyze a discrete-time network process in which each node holds a (weak) preference ordering over a finite set of alternatives and updates by local Borda aggregation. At each step, a node forms a weighted average (row-stochastic random-walk normalization) of its neighbors' Borda score vectors and projects the aggregated score back to a weak order. Updates are bounded: in each round, a node advances by at most one step along a shortest path in the fixed graph of preference orderings, following the direction prescribed by its neighbors' Borda-aggregated preferences. Our emphasis is dynamical: we develop sufficient conditions, stated directly in terms of graph topology, weights, and the bounded step rule, for (i) self-sustained oscillations in the absence of persistent sources, and (ii) forced oscillations under contrarian persistent camps. We also record robustness (structural stability) away from score-tie hyperplanes and contrast synchronous (Variant S) and asynchronous (Variant A) updating.

Borda Aggregation Dynamics of Preference Orderings on Networks

Abstract

We introduce and analyze a discrete-time network process in which each node holds a (weak) preference ordering over a finite set of alternatives and updates by local Borda aggregation. At each step, a node forms a weighted average (row-stochastic random-walk normalization) of its neighbors' Borda score vectors and projects the aggregated score back to a weak order. Updates are bounded: in each round, a node advances by at most one step along a shortest path in the fixed graph of preference orderings, following the direction prescribed by its neighbors' Borda-aggregated preferences. Our emphasis is dynamical: we develop sufficient conditions, stated directly in terms of graph topology, weights, and the bounded step rule, for (i) self-sustained oscillations in the absence of persistent sources, and (ii) forced oscillations under contrarian persistent camps. We also record robustness (structural stability) away from score-tie hyperplanes and contrast synchronous (Variant S) and asynchronous (Variant A) updating.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 28 sections, 18 theorems, 23 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 3.1

Every trajectory of Variant S (with fixed $P$ and deterministic $\textsf{Step}$) is eventually periodic: there exist $\mu\ge 0$ and $p\ge 1$ such that $\sigma(t+p)=\sigma(t)$ for all $t\ge \mu$. $\blacktriangleleft$$\blacktriangleleft$

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Hasse diagrams (cover graphs) of the weak-order lattices $\Omega(3)$ and $\Omega(4)$. For total preorders (ties allowed), $|\Omega(3)|=F(3)=13$ and $|\Omega(4)|=F(4)=75$, where $F(m)$ is the ordered Bell (Fubini) number.
  • Figure 2: A self-oscillation as in Theorem \ref{['thm:self_traveling_wave']}.
  • Figure 3: Minimal forcing gadget underlying Corollary \ref{['cor:two_node_gadget']}

Theorems & Definitions (46)

  • Remark 2.1: Move graph versus Kemeny/Kendall distances
  • Remark 2.2
  • Definition 2.1: Bounded step
  • Definition 2.2: Persistent (boundary) nodes
  • Definition 2.3: Variant S: synchronous bounded Borda dynamics
  • Definition 2.4: Variant A: asynchronous bounded Borda dynamics (contrast)
  • Proposition 3.1: Eventual periodicity
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.2: Local Borda equilibria as fixed points
  • proof
  • ...and 36 more