Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A homogenization principle for total variation

Aryeh Kontorovich

Abstract

A homogenization principle for total variation We prove an inequality comparing the variational distance between pairs of product probability measures to its homogenized counterpart. If $P_1,\ldots,P_n,Q_1,\ldots,Q_n$ are arbitrary probability measures on a measurable space and $\bar P:=\frac1n\sum_{i=1}^n P_i, \bar Q:=\frac1n\sum_{i=1}^n Q_i $, we show that $$TV\!\left(\bigotimes_{i=1}^n P_i, \bigotimes_{i=1}^n Q_i\right) \;\ge\; c\,TV(\bar P^{\otimes n},\bar Q^{\otimes n}),$$ where $c>0$ is a universal constant. The proof is based on a one-dimensional representation of total variation between products. We embed pairs of probability distributions $P_i,Q_i$ into positive measures $η_i$ on $\mathbb{R}$. We then define a functional $T$ over measures on $\mathbb{R}$ that realizes TV over products via convolution: $TV\!\left(\bigotimes_{i=1}^n P_i, \bigotimes_{i=1}^n Q_i\right)=T(η_1*\cdots *η_n)$. Our main analytic discovery is that for the relevant class of positive measures $η_i$, the convolution inequality $T(η_1*\cdots*η_n) \ge c\,T\!\left(\barη^{*n}\right)$ holds, where $\barη=\frac1n\sum_{i=1}^n η_i$. Finally, a higher-dimensional lifting argument shows that $T\!\left(\barη^{*n}\right)\ge TV(\bar P^{\otimes n},\bar Q^{\otimes n})$. To our knowledge, both the exact representation and the convolution inequality are new.

A homogenization principle for total variation

Abstract

A homogenization principle for total variation We prove an inequality comparing the variational distance between pairs of product probability measures to its homogenized counterpart. If are arbitrary probability measures on a measurable space and , we show that where is a universal constant. The proof is based on a one-dimensional representation of total variation between products. We embed pairs of probability distributions into positive measures on . We then define a functional over measures on that realizes TV over products via convolution: . Our main analytic discovery is that for the relevant class of positive measures , the convolution inequality holds, where . Finally, a higher-dimensional lifting argument shows that . To our knowledge, both the exact representation and the convolution inequality are new.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 14 theorems, 126 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $\Omega$ be a finite set, $n\ge1$, and $P_i,Q_i$, $i\in[n]$, strictly positive probability mass functions on $\Omega$. If $(P_i,Q_i)\mapsto\eta_i$ are defined as in eq:etai and $T$ as in eq:Tdef, then $\blacktriangleleft$$\blacktriangleleft$

Theorems & Definitions (28)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Theorem 4
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:encoding']}
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:lift']}
  • Theorem 5
  • Lemma 6: Multilinear score representation
  • proof
  • ...and 18 more