Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Virtual element approximation of eigenvalue problems: is the stabilization of the right hand side necessary?

Daniele Boffi, Francesca Gardini, Lucia Gastaldi

Abstract

The VEM approximation of eigenvalue problems usually involves the appropriate tuning of stabilization parameters, unless self-stabilizing or stabilization-free VEM are used. In this paper we prove that for elliptic self-adjoint eigenvalue problems the stabilization of the mass matrix is not necessary when lower order standard VEM spaces are adopted. Numerical evidence shows that also for higher order schemes the same result is true on various mesh sequences.

Virtual element approximation of eigenvalue problems: is the stabilization of the right hand side necessary?

Abstract

The VEM approximation of eigenvalue problems usually involves the appropriate tuning of stabilization parameters, unless self-stabilizing or stabilization-free VEM are used. In this paper we prove that for elliptic self-adjoint eigenvalue problems the stabilization of the mass matrix is not necessary when lower order standard VEM spaces are adopted. Numerical evidence shows that also for higher order schemes the same result is true on various mesh sequences.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 10 theorems, 67 equations, 2 figures, 25 tables.

Key Result

Lemma 1

The operator $\widetilde{T}_h$ maps the space $\mathbb{K}_{b,h}^\perp$ into itself. $\blacktriangleleft$$\blacktriangleleft$

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Coarsest meshes of different types: $\mathcal{T}$ triangles, $\mathcal{S}$ squares, $\mathcal{V}$ Voronoi, $\mathcal{H}$ hexagons
  • Figure 2: Coarsest dyadic mesh $\mathcal{D}$

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2
  • Remark 1
  • Remark 2
  • Proposition 3
  • proof
  • Remark 3
  • Lemma 4
  • Lemma 5
  • ...and 7 more