Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Financial Dynamics and Interconnected Risk of Liquid Restaking

Hasret Ozan Sevim, Christof Ferreira Torres

Abstract

Decentralized finance introduces new business models and use cases as part of digital finance. Restaking has recently emerged as a transformative mechanism in DeFi, promising extra yields but introducing complex and interconnected risks. The paper monitors the current restaking landscape, empirically analyzes the revenue drivers of a liquid restaking protocol, and conducts a technical investigation on the emitted risk arising from the interconnection between liquid restaking and other protocols. The revenue dynamics of Renzo Protocol are analyzed by employing an OLS regression model, Granger-causality and random forest feature importance tests. Our results identify that revenue is primarily predicted by the value locked in the underlying EigenLayer ecosystem, the yield of Renzo protocol's liquid restaking token and the multi-blockchain expansion of that token. The multi-blockchain expansion of the liquid restaking token presents a double-edged sword: bridging to other networks is crucial for user adoption, but it adds the bridge risks to the existing risks of restaking. We investigate the cross-contamination risk between different DeFi services and the liquid restaking protocol. By mapping the asset flow across the decentralized finance ecosystem, it is detected that the bridge risk of the current size of Renzo's liquid-restaking assets does not impose a systemic risk on the current restaking and staking ecosystem. To address the potential consequences of the emphasized interconnection risks, we introduce two hypothetical scenarios and a stress test, assuming a large number of compromised liquid restaking tokens and a smart contract logic failure in a DeFi protocol. Considering the overall liquid-restaking protocols and the growing interconnection, this analysis requires further work to explore the growing complexities.

Financial Dynamics and Interconnected Risk of Liquid Restaking

Abstract

Decentralized finance introduces new business models and use cases as part of digital finance. Restaking has recently emerged as a transformative mechanism in DeFi, promising extra yields but introducing complex and interconnected risks. The paper monitors the current restaking landscape, empirically analyzes the revenue drivers of a liquid restaking protocol, and conducts a technical investigation on the emitted risk arising from the interconnection between liquid restaking and other protocols. The revenue dynamics of Renzo Protocol are analyzed by employing an OLS regression model, Granger-causality and random forest feature importance tests. Our results identify that revenue is primarily predicted by the value locked in the underlying EigenLayer ecosystem, the yield of Renzo protocol's liquid restaking token and the multi-blockchain expansion of that token. The multi-blockchain expansion of the liquid restaking token presents a double-edged sword: bridging to other networks is crucial for user adoption, but it adds the bridge risks to the existing risks of restaking. We investigate the cross-contamination risk between different DeFi services and the liquid restaking protocol. By mapping the asset flow across the decentralized finance ecosystem, it is detected that the bridge risk of the current size of Renzo's liquid-restaking assets does not impose a systemic risk on the current restaking and staking ecosystem. To address the potential consequences of the emphasized interconnection risks, we introduce two hypothetical scenarios and a stress test, assuming a large number of compromised liquid restaking tokens and a smart contract logic failure in a DeFi protocol. Considering the overall liquid-restaking protocols and the growing interconnection, this analysis requires further work to explore the growing complexities.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 7 equations, 9 figures, 7 tables.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: The pie chart shows the total value locked (TVL) in the decentralized finance by sector as of October 4, 2025. The restaking and liquid-restaking sectors have a TVL of over 28 billion USD. The unit of USD amount is shown in billions ('B'). Source: https://defillama.com/categories (Last Access: October 4, 2025)
  • Figure 2: Restaking phenomenon can be explained with 'multi-validation'. Validators also work for other networks or protocols, not only for Ethereum. So they give more service with the same operation. But restakers put their ETH assets at risk if the validation fails.
  • Figure 3: Value Flow Chart: represents the interconnectedness between different DeFi services, specifically staking and restaking services. The numbers represent the ETH equivalent amounts as of 4th October 2025 12:00 PM UTC. The figure does not cover the overall decentralized finance ecosystem. However, it covers the top DeFi services and the related protocols that this paper focuses on, to underline the layered risks of bridges, rollups, and other protocols. Sources: https://beaconcha.in/charts/staked_ether, https://etherscan.io/token/0xae7ab96520de3a18e5e111b5eaab095312d7fe84, https://app.aave.com/reserve-overview/?underlyingAsset=0x7f39c581f595b53c5cb19bd0b3f8da6c935e2ca0&marketName=proto_mainnet_v3, https://app.uniswap.org/explore/pools/ethereum/0x109830a1aaad605bbf02a9dfa7b0b92ec2fb7daa, https://www.curve.finance/dex/ethereum/pools/factory-tricrypto-2/deposit, https://balancer.fi/pools/ethereum/v2/0x3de27efa2f1aa663ae5d458857e731c129069f29000200000000000000000588, https://app.pendle.finance/trade/pools/0xc374f7ec85f8c7de3207a10bb1978ba104bda3b2/zap/in?chain=ethereum, https://defillama.com/protocol/renzo?denomination=ETH, https://app.aave.com/reserve-overview/?underlyingAsset=0x2416092f143378750bb29b79ed961ab195cceea5&marketName=proto_linea_v3, https://lineascan.build/address/0xd66d0e2454d9e0eee51440cd23215f46e7d20a83 (Last Access: October 4, 2025).
  • Figure 4: Illustration of Scenarios: The diagram shows the chain of dependencies and the cascading effects for two hypothetical scenarios: A potential situation in case of compromised LRTs and a potential smart contract logic failure where LRTs are locked. The diagram is created on the Eraser App.
  • Figure 5: TVL in Renzo Protocol The figure represents the TVL of the Renzo Protocol over time, with the raw data for the period between 17 December 2023 and 18 April 2025. The vertical cutout dashes represent the tokenization events. Source: https://thegraph.com/
  • ...and 4 more figures