Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Eliminating Illusion in Directed Networks

Sougata Jana, Sanjukta Roy

Abstract

We study illusion elimination problems on directed social networks where each vertex is colored either red or blue. A vertex is under \textit{majority illusion} if it has more red out-neighbors than blue out-neighbors when there are more blue vertices than red ones in the network. In a more general phenomenon of $p$-illusion, at least $p$ fraction of the out-neighbors (as opposed to $1/2$ for majority) of a vertex is red. In the directed illusion elimination problem, we recolor minimum number of vertices so that no vertex is under $p$-illusion, for $p\in (0,1)$. Unfortunately, the problem is NP-hard for $p =1/2$ even when the network is a grid. Moreover, the problem is NP-hard and W[2]-hard when parameterized by the number of recolorings for each $p \in (0,1)$ even on bipartite DAGs. Thus, we can neither get a polynomial time algorithm on DAGs, unless P=NP, nor we can get a FPT algorithm even by combining solution size and directed graph parameters that measure distance from acyclicity, unless FPT=W[2]. We show that the problem can be solved in polynomial time in structured, sparse networks such as outerplanar networks, outward grids, trees, and cycles. Finally, we show tractable algorithms parameterized by treewidth of the underlying undirected graph, and by the number of vertices under illusion.

Eliminating Illusion in Directed Networks

Abstract

We study illusion elimination problems on directed social networks where each vertex is colored either red or blue. A vertex is under \textit{majority illusion} if it has more red out-neighbors than blue out-neighbors when there are more blue vertices than red ones in the network. In a more general phenomenon of -illusion, at least fraction of the out-neighbors (as opposed to for majority) of a vertex is red. In the directed illusion elimination problem, we recolor minimum number of vertices so that no vertex is under -illusion, for . Unfortunately, the problem is NP-hard for even when the network is a grid. Moreover, the problem is NP-hard and W[2]-hard when parameterized by the number of recolorings for each even on bipartite DAGs. Thus, we can neither get a polynomial time algorithm on DAGs, unless P=NP, nor we can get a FPT algorithm even by combining solution size and directed graph parameters that measure distance from acyclicity, unless FPT=W[2]. We show that the problem can be solved in polynomial time in structured, sparse networks such as outerplanar networks, outward grids, trees, and cycles. Finally, we show tractable algorithms parameterized by treewidth of the underlying undirected graph, and by the number of vertices under illusion.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 15 theorems, 12 equations, 10 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Difr is NP-complete on directed grids.

Figures (10)

  • Figure 4: Construction in \ref{['thm:pdifrreduction']}, with $A_1=\{u_1,u_2\}$, $A_2=\{u_1,u_3,u_n\}$
  • Figure : (a) All are under majority illusion
  • Figure : (a) Rectilinear embedding
  • Figure : First scenario
  • Figure : (a) All are under majority illusion
  • ...and 5 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (39)

  • proof
  • proof
  • Theorem 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 1
  • proof : Proof of \ref{['lem:gridminorporp']}
  • Lemma 2
  • proof : Proof of \ref{['lem:gridback']}
  • proof : Proof of \ref{['obs:grid_subpath']}
  • Corollary 1
  • ...and 29 more