Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Variational LSTM with Augmented Inputs: Nonlinear Response History Metamodeling with Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty

Manisha Sapkota, Min Li, Bowei Li

Abstract

Uncertainty propagation in high-dimensional nonlinear dynamic structural systems is pivotal in state-of-the-art performance-based design and risk assessment, where uncertainties from both excitations and structures, i.e., the aleatoric uncertainty, must be considered. This poses a significant challenge due to heavy computational demands. Machine learning techniques are thus introduced as metamodels to alleviate this burden. However, the "black box" nature of Machine learning models underscores the necessity of avoiding overly confident predictions, particularly when data and training efforts are insufficient. This creates a need, in addition to considering the aleatoric uncertainty, of estimating the uncertainty related to the prediction confidence, i.e., epistemic uncertainty, for machine learning-based metamodels. We developed a probabilistic metamodeling technique based on a variational long short-term memory (LSTM) with augmented inputs to simultaneously capture aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Key random system parameters are treated as augmented inputs alongside excitation series carrying record-to-record variability to capture the full range of aleatoric uncertainty. Meanwhile, epistemic uncertainty is effectively approximated via the Monte Carlo dropout scheme. Unlike computationally expensive full Bayesian approaches, this method incurs negligible additional training costs while enabling nearly cost-free uncertainty simulation. The proposed technique is demonstrated through multiple case studies involving stochastic seismic or wind excitations. Results show that the calibrated metamodels accurately reproduce nonlinear response time histories and provide confidence bounds indicating the associated epistemic uncertainty.

Variational LSTM with Augmented Inputs: Nonlinear Response History Metamodeling with Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty

Abstract

Uncertainty propagation in high-dimensional nonlinear dynamic structural systems is pivotal in state-of-the-art performance-based design and risk assessment, where uncertainties from both excitations and structures, i.e., the aleatoric uncertainty, must be considered. This poses a significant challenge due to heavy computational demands. Machine learning techniques are thus introduced as metamodels to alleviate this burden. However, the "black box" nature of Machine learning models underscores the necessity of avoiding overly confident predictions, particularly when data and training efforts are insufficient. This creates a need, in addition to considering the aleatoric uncertainty, of estimating the uncertainty related to the prediction confidence, i.e., epistemic uncertainty, for machine learning-based metamodels. We developed a probabilistic metamodeling technique based on a variational long short-term memory (LSTM) with augmented inputs to simultaneously capture aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Key random system parameters are treated as augmented inputs alongside excitation series carrying record-to-record variability to capture the full range of aleatoric uncertainty. Meanwhile, epistemic uncertainty is effectively approximated via the Monte Carlo dropout scheme. Unlike computationally expensive full Bayesian approaches, this method incurs negligible additional training costs while enabling nearly cost-free uncertainty simulation. The proposed technique is demonstrated through multiple case studies involving stochastic seismic or wind excitations. Results show that the calibrated metamodels accurately reproduce nonlinear response time histories and provide confidence bounds indicating the associated epistemic uncertainty.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 30 sections, 18 equations, 10 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (10)

  • Figure 1: The developed framework
  • Figure 2: (a) The SDOF Bouc-Wen system subjected to ground motion in Case 1; (b) A realization of the hysteresis curve; (c) A realization of ground motion; (d) Mean spectrum and spectra samples.
  • Figure 3: Training and validation loss of metamodel in Case 1
  • Figure 4: (a) Comparison of the mean and 95% confidence interval of the displacement response by the metamodel against the high-fidelity reference; (b) Error time history of the mean response by the metamodel; (c) Comparison between peak displacements by the metamodel and by the high-fidelity reference.
  • Figure 5: (a) The shear building model in Case 2; (b) A representative inter-story hysteresis curve; (c) The target spectrum, mean and sample spectra of the generated ground motion realizations; (d) A representative ground motion realization.
  • ...and 5 more figures