Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Customizing Large Vision Model-Guided Low-Rank Approximation for Ground-Roll Denoise

Jiacheng Liao, Feng Qian, Ziyin Fan, Yongjian Guo

Abstract

Ground-roll is a dominant source of coherent noise in land and vertical seismic profiling (VSP) data, severely masking reflection events and degrading subsequent imaging and interpretation. Conventional attenuation methods, including transform-domain filtering, sparse representation, and deep learning, often suffer from limited adaptability, signal leakage, or dependence on labeled training data, especially under strong signal-noise overlap. To address these challenges, we propose a training-free framework that reformulates ground-roll attenuation as a semantic-guided signal separation problem. Specifically, a promptable large vision model is employed to extract high-level semantic priors by converting seismic gathers into visual representations and localizing ground-roll-dominant regions via text or image prompts. The resulting semantic response is transformed into a continuous soft mask, which is embedded into a mask-conditioned low-rank inverse formulation to enable spatially adaptive suppression and reflection-preserving reconstruction. An efficient alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM)-based solver is further developed to solve the proposed inverse problem, enabling stable and physically consistent signal recovery without requiring task-specific training or manual annotation. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and field VSP datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior ground-roll attenuation while preserving reflection continuity and waveform fidelity, consistently outperforming representative transform-domain filtering and implicit neural representation methods.

Customizing Large Vision Model-Guided Low-Rank Approximation for Ground-Roll Denoise

Abstract

Ground-roll is a dominant source of coherent noise in land and vertical seismic profiling (VSP) data, severely masking reflection events and degrading subsequent imaging and interpretation. Conventional attenuation methods, including transform-domain filtering, sparse representation, and deep learning, often suffer from limited adaptability, signal leakage, or dependence on labeled training data, especially under strong signal-noise overlap. To address these challenges, we propose a training-free framework that reformulates ground-roll attenuation as a semantic-guided signal separation problem. Specifically, a promptable large vision model is employed to extract high-level semantic priors by converting seismic gathers into visual representations and localizing ground-roll-dominant regions via text or image prompts. The resulting semantic response is transformed into a continuous soft mask, which is embedded into a mask-conditioned low-rank inverse formulation to enable spatially adaptive suppression and reflection-preserving reconstruction. An efficient alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM)-based solver is further developed to solve the proposed inverse problem, enabling stable and physically consistent signal recovery without requiring task-specific training or manual annotation. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and field VSP datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior ground-roll attenuation while preserving reflection continuity and waveform fidelity, consistently outperforming representative transform-domain filtering and implicit neural representation methods.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 22 sections, 25 equations, 9 figures, 3 tables, 1 algorithm.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the proposed LVM-LRA model.
  • Figure 2: Denoising comparison on synthetic VSP data. (a) Original VSP data . Denoised results, removal noise, and local similarity comparisons using (b)(f)(j) proposed LVM-LRA, (c)(g)(k) F-K, (d)(h)(l) BP, and (e)(i)(m) INR.
  • Figure 3: Spectral comparison of the denoised results in Fig. \ref{['Fig:syn0']}: (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e), Frequency--wavenumber spectra of Fig. \ref{['Fig:syn0']} (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), respectively.
  • Figure 4: Single-trace comparison of the ground-roll at the 800-818th trace between the original ground-roll and the extracted components by (a) proposed LVM-LRA, (b) F-K, (c) BP, and (d) INR.
  • Figure 5: Denoising comparison on the second real VSP data. (a) Original VSP data. Denoised results, removal noise, and local similarity comparisons using (b)(f)(j) proposed LVM-LRA, (e)(g)(k) F-K, (d)(h)(l) BP, and (e)(i)(m) INR.
  • ...and 4 more figures