Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Explicit MPC for Parameter Dependent Linear Systems

Carlos J. G. Rojas, Esteban Lage Cano, Leyla Özkan

Abstract

This paper presents two explicit Model Predictive Control formulations for linear systems parameterized in terms of design variables. Such parameter dependent behavior commonly arises from operating point dependent linearization of nonlinear systems as well as from variations in mechanical, electrical, or thermal properties associated with material selection in the design of the process or system components. In contrast to explicit MPC approaches that treat design parameter variations and dependencies as disturbances, the proposed methods incorporate the parameters directly into the system matrices in an affine manner. However, explicitly incorporating these dependencies significantly increases the complexity of explicit MPC formulations due to resulting nonlinear terms involving decision variables and parameters. We address this complexity by proposing two approximation methods. Both methods are applied to two examples, and their performances are compared with respect to the exact eMPC implementation.

Explicit MPC for Parameter Dependent Linear Systems

Abstract

This paper presents two explicit Model Predictive Control formulations for linear systems parameterized in terms of design variables. Such parameter dependent behavior commonly arises from operating point dependent linearization of nonlinear systems as well as from variations in mechanical, electrical, or thermal properties associated with material selection in the design of the process or system components. In contrast to explicit MPC approaches that treat design parameter variations and dependencies as disturbances, the proposed methods incorporate the parameters directly into the system matrices in an affine manner. However, explicitly incorporating these dependencies significantly increases the complexity of explicit MPC formulations due to resulting nonlinear terms involving decision variables and parameters. We address this complexity by proposing two approximation methods. Both methods are applied to two examples, and their performances are compared with respect to the exact eMPC implementation.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 18 sections, 61 equations, 4 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 3: MSD: Exact vs Method I and Method II results for $\theta = 0.5.$
  • Figure 4: MSD: Exact vs Method I and Method II results for $\theta = 1.$
  • Figure 5: HEX: Exact vs Method II results for $\theta = 0.5.$
  • Figure 6: HEX: Exact vs Method II results for $\theta = 1.$