Table of Contents
Fetching ...

CROCS Data Release I: Constraints on the Hubble Constant

Luke Weisenbach, Sophie L. Newman, Kieran Graham, Sai S. Dhavala, Benjamin Floyd, Neel Shah, Gemini 3 Flash, The CROCS Collaboration

Abstract

Recent cosmological surveys and datasets have highlighted a variety of tensions to the concordance model of our universe, $Λ$CDM. Of particular interest is the Hubble tension, the $5.5σ$ discrepancy between measurements of the Hubble constant $H_0$ using high redshift CMB data from Planck ($67.27\pm0.60$km$\text{s}^{-1}\text{Mpc}^{-1}$) and low redshift supernovae from SH0ES ($73.2\pm1.3$km$\text{s}^{-1}\text{Mpc}^{-1}$). To avoid stepping on any toes, we have initiated the CROCS collaboration to resolve this tension, gathering experts from across many fields of cosmology, astrophysics, astronomy, machine learning, data science, philosophy, and astrology. In this paper, we present findings from CROCS Data Release 1, corresponding to the first $\sim3$ days and 27 minutes (rest frame) of observation. We perform a robust statistical analysis, showing that Planck and SH0ES both suffer from imperial biasing systematics (IBS) at $5σ$ significance. Accounting for these errors by converting to metric units reconciles the high and low redshift data, with $H_0 = 69.00\pm0.420$km$\text{s}^{-1}\text{Mpc}^{-1}$. We thus report that our results are sufficient to end the Hubble tension for good.

CROCS Data Release I: Constraints on the Hubble Constant

Abstract

Recent cosmological surveys and datasets have highlighted a variety of tensions to the concordance model of our universe, CDM. Of particular interest is the Hubble tension, the discrepancy between measurements of the Hubble constant using high redshift CMB data from Planck (km) and low redshift supernovae from SH0ES (km). To avoid stepping on any toes, we have initiated the CROCS collaboration to resolve this tension, gathering experts from across many fields of cosmology, astrophysics, astronomy, machine learning, data science, philosophy, and astrology. In this paper, we present findings from CROCS Data Release 1, corresponding to the first days and 27 minutes (rest frame) of observation. We perform a robust statistical analysis, showing that Planck and SH0ES both suffer from imperial biasing systematics (IBS) at significance. Accounting for these errors by converting to metric units reconciles the high and low redshift data, with km. We thus report that our results are sufficient to end the Hubble tension for good.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 18 sections, 8 equations, 3 figures, 1 table.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Overhead view of the Swindon 'Magic Roundabout'.
  • Figure 2: Comparison of the surfaces of two different crocs. Most crocs (\ref{['fig:crocodile']}) do not have voids on them, hence we shall ignore them in our analysis and focus instead on the other crocs (\ref{['fig:croc']}).
  • Figure 3: The Hubble Tension, explained by the only metric that matters: Croc Strap Alignment.