Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Multitype PCR branching processes

P. Chigansky, F. Klebaner, M. Mrksa, S. Sagitov

Abstract

To model amplification Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) techniques targeting DNA sequences of several types, we introduce a multitype PCR branching process as a generalized version of the Michaelis-Menten-based branching process model introduced in Jagers-Klebaner, 2003. We establish two limit theorems extending the results of Chigansky-Jagers-Klebaner, 2018 to the multitype case.

Multitype PCR branching processes

Abstract

To model amplification Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) techniques targeting DNA sequences of several types, we introduce a multitype PCR branching process as a generalized version of the Michaelis-Menten-based branching process model introduced in Jagers-Klebaner, 2003. We establish two limit theorems extending the results of Chigansky-Jagers-Klebaner, 2018 to the multitype case.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 10 theorems, 106 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

Consider the MPCR branching process $\bar{Z}(n)$. Given that parameters viq and the initial vector $\bar{Z}(0)$ are fixed, assume that parameter $K\in\mathbb (0,\infty)$ varies in such a way that Then putting $\kappa=\log_{b_1}K$, we have where $W_1,\ldots,W_d$ are independent random values defined by branchlim and $W_0=W_1+\ldots+W_{d_0}.$

Figures (3)

  • Figure 2: An illustration of Theorem \ref{['mainthm']} in the case $d=2$ with $b_1=1.9$, $b_2=1.2$ and $\kappa=25$ based on 200 simulations.
  • Figure 3: The joint distribution of $H(W_1)$ and $W_2G_2(W_1)$ in the case $d=2$ with $b_1=1.9$, $b_2=1.2$.
  • Figure 4: An illustration of Theorem \ref{['thm']} in the case $d=5$, $b_1=b_2=b_3=b_4=b_5=1.9$, and $K=b_1^{-29}$. Here the directly simulated values $Z_i(26)/K$ are matched against the limiting values $V_i=W_iW^{-1}f^{(-3)}(H(W))$.

Theorems & Definitions (19)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Theorem 3.2
  • Lemma 5.1
  • proof
  • Lemma A.1
  • proof
  • Lemma A.2
  • proof
  • Lemma A.3
  • ...and 9 more