Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Control Without Control: Defining Implicit Interaction Paradigms for Autonomous Assistive Robots

Janavi Gupta, Kavya Puthuveetil, Dimitra Tsakona, Akhil Padmanabha, Yiannis Demiris, Zackory Erickson

Abstract

Assistive robotic systems have shown growing potential to improve the quality of life of those with disabilities. As researchers explore the automation of various caregiving tasks, considerations for how the technology can still preserve the user's sense of control become paramount to ensuring that robotic systems are aligned with fundamental user needs and motivations. In this work, we present two previously developed systems as design cases through which to explore an interaction paradigm that we call implicit control, where the behavior of an autonomous robot is modified based on users' natural behavioral cues, instead of some direct input. Our selected design cases, unlike systems in past work, specifically probe users' perception of the interaction. We find, from a new thematic analysis of qualitative feedback on both cases, that designing for effective implicit control enables both a reduction in perceived workload and the preservation of the users' sense of control through the system's intuitiveness and responsiveness, contextual awareness, and ability to adapt to preferences. We further derive a set of core guidelines for designers in deciding when and how to apply implicit interaction paradigms for their assistive applications.

Control Without Control: Defining Implicit Interaction Paradigms for Autonomous Assistive Robots

Abstract

Assistive robotic systems have shown growing potential to improve the quality of life of those with disabilities. As researchers explore the automation of various caregiving tasks, considerations for how the technology can still preserve the user's sense of control become paramount to ensuring that robotic systems are aligned with fundamental user needs and motivations. In this work, we present two previously developed systems as design cases through which to explore an interaction paradigm that we call implicit control, where the behavior of an autonomous robot is modified based on users' natural behavioral cues, instead of some direct input. Our selected design cases, unlike systems in past work, specifically probe users' perception of the interaction. We find, from a new thematic analysis of qualitative feedback on both cases, that designing for effective implicit control enables both a reduction in perceived workload and the preservation of the users' sense of control through the system's intuitiveness and responsiveness, contextual awareness, and ability to adapt to preferences. We further derive a set of core guidelines for designers in deciding when and how to apply implicit interaction paradigms for their assistive applications.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 28 sections, 2 figures.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 2: Top: We present two assistive systems as design cases for implicit control. Middle: We perform a thematic analysis of users' qualitative feedback on interactions with the systems and derive a set of core themes. Bottom: From these themes, we establish a set of design guidelines.
  • Figure 3: A subset of quotes from both the WAFFLE and CRAFTT studies, presented and organized according to the categories outlined in our thematic analysis.