Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Adaptive differentiating filter: case study of PID feedback control

Alexey Pavlov, Michael Ruderman

Abstract

This paper presents an adaptive causal discrete-time filter for derivative estimation, exemplified by its use in estimating relative velocity in a mechatronic application. The filter is based on a constrained least squares estimator with window adaptation. It demonstrates low sensitivity to low-amplitude measurement noise, while preserving a wide bandwidth for large-amplitude changes in the process signal. Favorable performance properties of the filter are discussed and demonstrated in a practical case study of PID feedback controller and compared experimentally to a standard linear low-pass filter-based differentiator and a robust sliding-mode based homogeneous differentiator.

Adaptive differentiating filter: case study of PID feedback control

Abstract

This paper presents an adaptive causal discrete-time filter for derivative estimation, exemplified by its use in estimating relative velocity in a mechatronic application. The filter is based on a constrained least squares estimator with window adaptation. It demonstrates low sensitivity to low-amplitude measurement noise, while preserving a wide bandwidth for large-amplitude changes in the process signal. Favorable performance properties of the filter are discussed and demonstrated in a practical case study of PID feedback controller and compared experimentally to a standard linear low-pass filter-based differentiator and a robust sliding-mode based homogeneous differentiator.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 20 sections, 1 theorem, 24 equations, 6 figures, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Inequality (linineq) is feasible if and only if

Figures (6)

  • Figure 2: Shaped loop transfer function $C(j\omega)G(j\omega)$ with identified system plant $G(j\omega)$ and PID control $C(j\omega)$ designed by symmetrical optimum.
  • Figure 3: Actuator system in laboratory setting with translational motion $x$.
  • Figure 4: Measured and identified FRF of the system.
  • Figure 5: Measured noisy output and its distribution at the idle state ($u=0$) in (a), and exemplary $\dot{x}(t)$ estimate by means of LDF and ADF in (b).
  • Figure 6: Numerically determined FRF of three differentiators.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (1)

  • Theorem 1