Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Attribution of Spurious Factors from High-Dimensional Functional Time Series

Adam Nie, Yanrong Yang, Han Lin Shang, Yi He

Abstract

This article explores a general factor structure for high-dimensional nonstationary functional time series, encompassing a wide range of factor models studied in the existing literature. We investigate the asymptotic spectral behaviors of the sample covariance operator under this general data structure. A novel fundamental sufficient condition, formulated in terms of a newly introduced effective rank tailored to this setup, is established under which empirical eigen-analysis yields spurious results, rendering sample eigenvalues and eigenvectors unreliable for accurately recovering the underlying factor structure. This generalizes the results of Onatski and Wang [2021] from typical high-dimensional time series (HDTS) to the more intricate functional framework. The newly defined effective rank is rigorously analyzed through a decomposition of the effects attributable to functional factor loadings and functional factors. Contrary to the findings in the HDTS setting, empirical eigen-analysis of models with only a small number of strong non-stationary factors may still produce spurious limits in the functional framework. Therefore, additional caution is warranted when applying covariance-based statistical methods to potentially nonstationary functional data. Simulation studies are performed to determine conditions under which spurious limits occur. Real data analysis on age-specific mortality rate data from multiple locations is conducted for evidence of spurious factors induced by empirical eigen-analysis.

Attribution of Spurious Factors from High-Dimensional Functional Time Series

Abstract

This article explores a general factor structure for high-dimensional nonstationary functional time series, encompassing a wide range of factor models studied in the existing literature. We investigate the asymptotic spectral behaviors of the sample covariance operator under this general data structure. A novel fundamental sufficient condition, formulated in terms of a newly introduced effective rank tailored to this setup, is established under which empirical eigen-analysis yields spurious results, rendering sample eigenvalues and eigenvectors unreliable for accurately recovering the underlying factor structure. This generalizes the results of Onatski and Wang [2021] from typical high-dimensional time series (HDTS) to the more intricate functional framework. The newly defined effective rank is rigorously analyzed through a decomposition of the effects attributable to functional factor loadings and functional factors. Contrary to the findings in the HDTS setting, empirical eigen-analysis of models with only a small number of strong non-stationary factors may still produce spurious limits in the functional framework. Therefore, additional caution is warranted when applying covariance-based statistical methods to potentially nonstationary functional data. Simulation studies are performed to determine conditions under which spurious limits occur. Real data analysis on age-specific mortality rate data from multiple locations is conducted for evidence of spurious factors induced by empirical eigen-analysis.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 18 sections, 9 theorems, 122 equations, 8 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Proposition 2.6

Let $C_1$ and $C_2$ be given as in Definition definition - C Omega, and $\Omega$ is defined in (eq- def of Omega). Then

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Setting 1 - $C_\epsilon$ delocalized, loading matrices are of full-column rank
  • Figure 2: Setting 3 - $C_\epsilon$ localized, loading matrices are of full-column rank
  • Figure 3: Setting 4 - $C_\epsilon$ localized, loading matrices are of low-effective rank
  • Figure 4: Setting 5 - $C_\epsilon$ is of rank 2, loading matrices are of full-column rank
  • Figure 5: Setting 6 - $C_\epsilon$ is of rank 2, loading matrices are of low-effective rank
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (32)

  • Example 2.1
  • Example 2.2
  • Example 2.3
  • Example 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Proposition 2.6
  • Remark 2.7
  • Remark 3.2
  • Remark 3.4
  • Remark 3.5
  • ...and 22 more