Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Sign control of photocurrents by spin-group-symmetry breaking in altermagnetic insulators

Gastón Blatter, Xiao Zhang, Jeroen van den Brink, Mengli Hu, Shu Zhang

Abstract

Controlling physical responses through symmetry breaking is a central paradigm in quantum materials, enabling novel functionalities. Here we determine the effects of spin-group-symmetry breaking on nonlinear optical responses of collinear altermagnetic insulators. Using shear strain as an example, we show that the direction of symmetry-breaking induced components of charge and spin photocurrents are locked to the sign of the strain. In the absence of spin-orbit coupling, this effect is intuitively captured by the spin-gap asymmetry--an imbalance between spin-up and spin-down direct band gaps which couples trilinearly with the Néel order and the strain. We demonstrate this mechanism with density functional theory calculations on the recently proposed altermagnet CuWP$_2$S$_6$. Having symmetry-guided control of both charge and spin photocurrents allows, vice versa, to reveal and investigate altermagnetism in insulating materials by exploration of their optical responses.

Sign control of photocurrents by spin-group-symmetry breaking in altermagnetic insulators

Abstract

Controlling physical responses through symmetry breaking is a central paradigm in quantum materials, enabling novel functionalities. Here we determine the effects of spin-group-symmetry breaking on nonlinear optical responses of collinear altermagnetic insulators. Using shear strain as an example, we show that the direction of symmetry-breaking induced components of charge and spin photocurrents are locked to the sign of the strain. In the absence of spin-orbit coupling, this effect is intuitively captured by the spin-gap asymmetry--an imbalance between spin-up and spin-down direct band gaps which couples trilinearly with the Néel order and the strain. We demonstrate this mechanism with density functional theory calculations on the recently proposed altermagnet CuWPS. Having symmetry-guided control of both charge and spin photocurrents allows, vice versa, to reveal and investigate altermagnetism in insulating materials by exploration of their optical responses.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 13 equations, 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: (a) Schematic band structure of a two-dimensional $d$-wave altermagnetic insulator, where red (blue) denotes the spin up (down) bands. The rectified photocurrents obey corresponding symmetry constraints, which, in this example, forbid a spin current along $x$ and charge current along $y$. (b) Upon spin-group symmetry breaking induced by shear strain, the band structure is shifted and develops a finite spin-gap asymmetry $\Delta_a$. The spin and charge photocurrent components forbidden in (a) are are thereby activated.
  • Figure 2: (a–b) Crystal and magnetic structure of the CuWP$_2$S$_6$ monolayer in the altermanget-antiferroelectric phase. (c) Band structure of the CuWP$_2$S$_6$ monolayer without SOC; blue and red lines denote spin-down and spin-up bands, respectively. (d) Isoenergy contours at $E= E_f-0.2$ eV for pristine and strained monolayers. (e) Band structures under strain (dashed lines) and without strain (solid lines) plotted for the boxed region in (c). (f) NLOR of CuWP$_2$S$_6$ under linearly polarized (blue) and circularly polarized (red) light; solid lines represent charge conductivities, while dashed lines represent spin conductivities. (g-h) Representative strain-induced charge and spin components in NLOR. The responses are odd upon reversal of shear strain $\epsilon_{xy}$.
  • Figure 3: (a) Momentum-resolved imbalance in the spin-resolved joint density of states $\Delta \rho (\mathbf{k}, \omega)$ at fixed frequency $\hbar\omega = 1.25$ eV for pristine and strained unit cells. The unit cells under positive and negative shear strain are related by altermagnetic symmetries, which manifest in the corresponding $\Delta \rho$ patterns. (b) Momentum-integrated $\Delta \rho (\omega)$ as a function of the incident photon energy, which is odd under strain reversal over the entire frequency range.
  • Figure 4: Polar angle plots of the charge (left panels) and spin (right panels) currents generated with linearly polarized light at $\hbar\omega = 1.2$ eV for: (a) $\epsilon_{xy} = 0$, (b) $\epsilon_{xy} > 0$ and (c) $\epsilon_{xy} < 0$. The color of the points indicate the value of the angle associated to the direction $\theta$ of the generated current, with respect to the its average value.