Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Complete Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order QCD Correction to $J/ψ\to 3γ$ Decay

Chao Zeng, Bin Gong, Jian-Xiong Wang, Ruichang Niu, Xu-Dong Huang, Cong Li

Abstract

We address the long-standing problem of negative decay and production rates in perturbative QCD for exclusive processes by proposing amplitude-level NRQCD factorization as a systematic prescription. Building on this, we present the first complete next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) QCD correction to the decay $J/ψ\to 3γ$. The resulting partial width, $Γ(J/ψ\to 3γ) = 0.96^{+4.32}_{-0.13}$ eV, combines this NNLO contribution with the known up to $\mathcal{O}(α_s v^2)$ relativistic correction and shows markedly improved agreement with the high-precision BESIII measurement. In the same way, $Γ(Υ\to 3γ) = 0.0086^{+0.0028}_{-0.0006}$ eV is obtained. The dominant theoretical uncertainty originates from the renormalization scale variation, underscoring the challenge of perturbative convergence at this order and the necessity for future higher-order calculations.

Complete Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order QCD Correction to $J/ψ\to 3γ$ Decay

Abstract

We address the long-standing problem of negative decay and production rates in perturbative QCD for exclusive processes by proposing amplitude-level NRQCD factorization as a systematic prescription. Building on this, we present the first complete next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) QCD correction to the decay . The resulting partial width, eV, combines this NNLO contribution with the known up to relativistic correction and shows markedly improved agreement with the high-precision BESIII measurement. In the same way, eV is obtained. The dominant theoretical uncertainty originates from the renormalization scale variation, underscoring the challenge of perturbative convergence at this order and the necessity for future higher-order calculations.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 equations, 2 figures, 1 table.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Typical Feynman diagrams for LO, NLO, NNLO.
  • Figure 2: Renormalization scale dependence of partial decay widths: amplitude expansion (solid lines) vs. traditional expansion (dashed lines).