Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Cosmological constraints on the big bang quantum cosmology model

Yicheng Wang, Yupeng Yang, Xinyi Dai, Shuangxi Yi, Yankun Qu, Fayin Wang

Abstract

The big bang quantum cosmology model introduces the trace $J$ of the Schouten tensor as a form of dynamic dark energy. Together with cold dark matter, these components form the so-called $J$CDM cosmology model, proposed by M.H.P.M. van Putten (J. High Energy Astrophys., 45, 2025, 194), which offers a potential resolution to the Hubble tension. We derive the constraints on the $J$CDM cosmology model, utilizing early- and late-time cosmological data including cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) released by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), cosmic chronometers (CC), and type Ia supernovae (SNIa). For a flat universe, the $J$CDM model yields \( H_0 = 66.95 \pm 0.51 \, \rm{km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}} \) and \( Ω_m = 0.3419 \pm 0.0065 \), results that are consistent with early-universe observations but exhibit a higher \( Ω_m \) compared to the $Λ$CDM model. In the case of a non-flat universe, $J$CDM favors a slightly curved geometry with \( Ω_k = 0.0154 \pm 0.0027 \), leading to \( H_0 = 69.13 \pm 0.56 \, \rm {km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}} \) and \( Ω_m = 0.3477 \pm 0.0074 \). The increase in \( H_0 \) in the non-flat scenario suggests a geometric degeneracy between spatial curvature and \( H_0 \). We also investigate the internal inconsistencies present in DESI data and evaluate their impacts on cosmological parameter constraints. Our analysis shows that while the $J$CDM model, which is constructed from first principles without free parameters beyond those of $Λ$CDM, agrees excellently with late-time cosmology, it struggles to simultaneously match early-universe observations in a fully self-consistent manner.

Cosmological constraints on the big bang quantum cosmology model

Abstract

The big bang quantum cosmology model introduces the trace of the Schouten tensor as a form of dynamic dark energy. Together with cold dark matter, these components form the so-called CDM cosmology model, proposed by M.H.P.M. van Putten (J. High Energy Astrophys., 45, 2025, 194), which offers a potential resolution to the Hubble tension. We derive the constraints on the CDM cosmology model, utilizing early- and late-time cosmological data including cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) released by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), cosmic chronometers (CC), and type Ia supernovae (SNIa). For a flat universe, the CDM model yields and , results that are consistent with early-universe observations but exhibit a higher compared to the CDM model. In the case of a non-flat universe, CDM favors a slightly curved geometry with , leading to and . The increase in in the non-flat scenario suggests a geometric degeneracy between spatial curvature and . We also investigate the internal inconsistencies present in DESI data and evaluate their impacts on cosmological parameter constraints. Our analysis shows that while the CDM model, which is constructed from first principles without free parameters beyond those of CDM, agrees excellently with late-time cosmology, it struggles to simultaneously match early-universe observations in a fully self-consistent manner.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 14 sections, 25 equations, 4 figures, 5 tables.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: One-dimensional marginalized probability distributions and two-dimensional confidence contour plots for the flat $J$CDM cosmological model, derived from the DESI+CMB, DESI+CMB+CC, and DESI+CMB+CC+SNIa datasets. Plots are presented for two acoustic horizon scale $r_{d}$ configurations: one defined in Eq. (\ref{['eq:rd']}) (referred to as the "unfixed” case, left panel) and the CMB derived value $r_{d} = 147.09\pm{0.29} ~\mathrm{Mpc}$ (referred to as the"fixed” case, right panel). Here, $H_0$ is given in units of $\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}$.
  • Figure 2: One-dimensional marginalized probability distributions and two-dimensional confidence contour plots for the non-flat $J$CDM cosmological model, derived from the DESI+CMB, DESI+CMB+CC, and DESI+CMB+CC+SNIa datasets. Plots are presented for two acoustic horizon scale $r_{d}$ configurations: one defined in Eq. (\ref{['eq:rd']}) (referred to as the "unfixed” case, left panel) and the CMB derived value $r_{d} = 147.09\pm{0.29} ~\mathrm{Mpc}$ (referred to as the"fixed” case, right panel). Here, $H_0$ is given in units of $\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}$.
  • Figure 3: One-dimensional marginalized probability distributions and two-dimensional confidence contour plots for the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $J$CDM cosmological models, derived from full combined datasets DESI+CMB+CC+SNIa. Plots are presented for two acoustic horizon scale $r_{d}$ configurations: one defined in Eq. (\ref{['eq:rd']}) (referred to as the "unfixed” case, left panel) and the CMB derived value $r_{d} = 147.09\pm{0.29} ~\mathrm{Mpc}$ (referred to as the"fixed” case, right panel). For comparison, results with and without the DESI BAO data at $z_{\rm eff}=0.51$ (shown as $z=0.51$) are also plotted. Here, $H_0$ is given in units of $\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}$.
  • Figure 4: One-dimensional marginalized probability distributions and two-dimensional confidence contour plots for the non-flat $\Lambda$CDM and $J$CDM cosmological models, derived from full combined datasets DESI+CMB+CC+SNIa. Plots are presented for two acoustic horizon scale $r_{d}$ configurations: one defined in Eq. (\ref{['eq:rd']}) (referred to as the "unfixed” case, left panel) and the CMB derived value $r_{d} = 147.09\pm{0.29} ~\mathrm{Mpc}$ (referred to as the"fixed” case, right panel). For comparison, results with and without the DESI BAO data at $z_{\rm eff}=0.51$ (shown as $z=0.51$) are also plotted. Here, $H_0$ is given in units of $\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}$.