Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Assessing Reporting Delays in ACLED Conflict Event Data

Faniry A. Razakason, Daniel Racek, Paul W. Thurner, Göran Kauermann

Abstract

Timely and accurate conflict event data are essential for real-time monitoring, forecasting, and policy response. Yet near-real-time conflict datasets such as the Armed Conflict Location \& Event Data Project (ACLED) are subject to reporting delays, that is, delays between event occurrence and first inclusion in the database. Such delays can introduce bias in short-term analyses and forecasts. This study provides a statistical analysis of reporting delays for African events recorded in ACLED's weekly releases from June 30, 2024, to June 1, 2025. Treating delay as a discrete time duration, we estimate grouped proportional hazards models with additive-linear and smooth terms incorporating event-level, spatial, and country-level covariates. Our results show that more than half of events are reported within two weeks, but delays vary systematically by event type, fatalities, geographic location, and political regime. Higher-fatality events are reported more quickly, while events in more restrictive political and informational environments tend to be reported more slowly. We also find substantial between-country heterogeneity, and country-specific analyses indicate that event-level effects differ across contexts. These findings show that reporting delays are structured rather than random and that real-time conflict analysis must account for them. More broadly, they provide an empirical foundation for developing nowcasting approaches to correct short-term underreporting in conflict event data.

Assessing Reporting Delays in ACLED Conflict Event Data

Abstract

Timely and accurate conflict event data are essential for real-time monitoring, forecasting, and policy response. Yet near-real-time conflict datasets such as the Armed Conflict Location \& Event Data Project (ACLED) are subject to reporting delays, that is, delays between event occurrence and first inclusion in the database. Such delays can introduce bias in short-term analyses and forecasts. This study provides a statistical analysis of reporting delays for African events recorded in ACLED's weekly releases from June 30, 2024, to June 1, 2025. Treating delay as a discrete time duration, we estimate grouped proportional hazards models with additive-linear and smooth terms incorporating event-level, spatial, and country-level covariates. Our results show that more than half of events are reported within two weeks, but delays vary systematically by event type, fatalities, geographic location, and political regime. Higher-fatality events are reported more quickly, while events in more restrictive political and informational environments tend to be reported more slowly. We also find substantial between-country heterogeneity, and country-specific analyses indicate that event-level effects differ across contexts. These findings show that reporting delays are structured rather than random and that real-time conflict analysis must account for them. More broadly, they provide an empirical foundation for developing nowcasting approaches to correct short-term underreporting in conflict event data.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 4 equations, 14 figures, 4 tables.

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: Sketch of reporting delay. The black (bottom) line shows the reported events at time point $t$. The blue (middle) line gives the numbers at $t+1$ and the green (top) line at $t+2$.
  • Figure 2: Reported conflict events over time based on dataset download dates. The figure illustrates the number of events occurring between January 1 and June 24, 2024, as recorded in datasets downloaded on June 30, 2024, the following 4 weeks, and on December 24, 2024
  • Figure 3: Kaplan--Meier curves of reporting delays: (a) first 100 weeks; (b) first 20 weeks by event type.
  • Figure 4: Conflict events plotted over a map of Africa, with each point colored according to its reporting delay in weeks.
  • Figure 5: Distribution of reporting delays in Cameroon and Sudan. Sudan shows a higher share of events reported early, whereas Cameroon has many more events with long reporting delays. Within-country variation is also visible: in Cameroon, delays are particularly pronounced in the South-West, while in South Sudan several highly delayed events appear near the southern border. These patterns highlight the presence of within-country heterogeneity in reporting delays.
  • ...and 9 more figures