Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Electromagnetic Inverse Scattering Problems

Q. C. Dong, Zi-Xuan Su, Qing Huo Liu, Wen Chen, Zhizhang, Chen

Abstract

This paper proposes a physics-informed neural operator (PINO) framework for solving inverse scattering problems, enabling rapid and accurate reconstructions under diverse measurement conditions. In the proposed approach, the dielectric property is represented as a learnable tensor, while a neural operator is employed to predict the induced current distribution. A hybrid loss function, consisting of the state loss, data loss and total-variation (TV) regularization, is constructed to establish a fully differentiable formulation for a joint optimization of network parameters and dielectric property. To demonstrate the framework's generality and flexibility, PINO is implemented using three representative neural operators, i.e., the Fourier Neural Operator (FNO), the enhanced Fourier Neural Operator (U-FNO) and the Factorized Fourier Neural Operator (F-FNO). Compared with conventional approaches, the proposed framework offers a simpler formulation and universal modeling capability, making it readily applicable to various measurement scenarios, including multi-frequency and phaseless inversion. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the proposed PINO achieves high accuracy and robust reconstruction across samples with and without phase information, under single-frequency and multi-frequency settings in the presence of noise. The results demonstrate that PINO consistently outperforms conventional contrast-source inversion (CSI) methods and provides an efficient, unified solution to complex electromagnetic inverse-scattering problems.

Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Electromagnetic Inverse Scattering Problems

Abstract

This paper proposes a physics-informed neural operator (PINO) framework for solving inverse scattering problems, enabling rapid and accurate reconstructions under diverse measurement conditions. In the proposed approach, the dielectric property is represented as a learnable tensor, while a neural operator is employed to predict the induced current distribution. A hybrid loss function, consisting of the state loss, data loss and total-variation (TV) regularization, is constructed to establish a fully differentiable formulation for a joint optimization of network parameters and dielectric property. To demonstrate the framework's generality and flexibility, PINO is implemented using three representative neural operators, i.e., the Fourier Neural Operator (FNO), the enhanced Fourier Neural Operator (U-FNO) and the Factorized Fourier Neural Operator (F-FNO). Compared with conventional approaches, the proposed framework offers a simpler formulation and universal modeling capability, making it readily applicable to various measurement scenarios, including multi-frequency and phaseless inversion. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the proposed PINO achieves high accuracy and robust reconstruction across samples with and without phase information, under single-frequency and multi-frequency settings in the presence of noise. The results demonstrate that PINO consistently outperforms conventional contrast-source inversion (CSI) methods and provides an efficient, unified solution to complex electromagnetic inverse-scattering problems.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 23 equations, 6 figures, 5 tables.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: A modeling setup: a two-dimensional TMz scattering scenario with an objective domain $D_{obj}$ containing a scatterer.
  • Figure 2: Framework of the proposed PINO for solving electromagnetic inverse scattering problem. The input consists of the normalized coordinates $X$ and $Y$, and the output of neural operator is the predicted induced current $\hat{J}$. The predicted contrast $\hat{\chi}$ is defined as one learnable tensor. $f_1$ and $f_n$ represent different frequencies.
  • Figure 3: (a)--(c) Ground truth and corresponding inversion results of the proposed framework with FNO at 3 GHz with 5% noise. ‘Iter $n$’ represents the inversion results after the $n$-th iteration. The rightmost column represents the loss curves during the iteration process.
  • Figure 4: Comparison of inversion results under 3 GHz using different methods.
  • Figure 5: Comparison of with-phase data inversion results using different neural operators.
  • ...and 1 more figures