Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Cyber-Physical System Design Space Exploration for Affordable Precision Agriculture

Pawan Kumar, Hokeun Kim

Abstract

Precision agriculture promises higher yields and sustainability, but adoption is slowed by the high cost of cyber-physical systems (CPS) and the lack of systematic design methods. We present a cost-aware design space exploration (DSE) framework for multimodal drone-rover platforms to integrate budget, energy, sensing, payload, computation, and communication constraints. Using integer linear programming (ILP) with SAT-based verification, our approach trades off among cost, coverage, and payload while ensuring constraint compliance and a multitude of alternatives. We conduct case studies on smaller and larger-sized farms to show that our method consistently achieves full coverage within budget while maximizing payload efficiency, outperforming state-of-the-art CPS DSE approaches.

Cyber-Physical System Design Space Exploration for Affordable Precision Agriculture

Abstract

Precision agriculture promises higher yields and sustainability, but adoption is slowed by the high cost of cyber-physical systems (CPS) and the lack of systematic design methods. We present a cost-aware design space exploration (DSE) framework for multimodal drone-rover platforms to integrate budget, energy, sensing, payload, computation, and communication constraints. Using integer linear programming (ILP) with SAT-based verification, our approach trades off among cost, coverage, and payload while ensuring constraint compliance and a multitude of alternatives. We conduct case studies on smaller and larger-sized farms to show that our method consistently achieves full coverage within budget while maximizing payload efficiency, outperforming state-of-the-art CPS DSE approaches.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 14 sections, 14 equations, 4 figures, 6 tables.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Example illustration of DSE for cost-effective multimodal software-hardware platforms with unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs or rovers) and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs or drones) for precision agriculture.
  • Figure 2: Trade-offs among design aspects in Case Study 2 ($1M, 10 acres): (a) unit cost vs. unit payload (b) total cost vs. total payload, (c) total cost vs. area coverage.
  • Figure 3: Comparative evaluation of optimizers in Case Study 1 ($100K, 1 acre): (a) total cost vs. payload, (b) total cost vs. area coverage.
  • Figure 4: Our prototype hardware constructed in line with the proposed approach's outputs.